Honestly, it will depend on who the candidates and their running mates are. I have not made my decision yet, and I can't make an informed decision until I know who the candidates for Pres. and VP are, and what their platforms are.
I do not vote a straight party ticket ever. I vote for the best individuals. That's the only way, in my opinion, you can get the best people in office.
If you want perspective, then go to a variety of sources including the DNC and RNC websites (democrat and republican national committee) as well as the websites for the individual candidates. Then, go online and research their positions on the issues, and their voting records. Don't trust just one source... look to a variety of sources and you will have a better chance of avoiding getting overly-biased information.
2007-11-14 05:49:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
We don't even know who's running. At the moment, everyone's caring about Hillary, Obama, Romney, Guiliani, Edwards... etc. Thing is, we don't know who will be going for VP, we don't know if some third party will actually put forward a good moderate... I don't make my choice (or at least try not to) before the candidates are announced. It's well and good how everyone's in full swing now, but there is still much time.
2007-11-14 05:57:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by K 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
once you vote you ought to no longer that approximately money. shall we are saying you graduate college and you family contributors money owed are paid off. Now your searching for employment and there is no longer something there?? My brother an accountant making $2 hundred ok a three hundred and sixty 5 days misplaced his activity. He served time interior the militia to pay for training did each and every thing ideal. Now he's caught and would not understand what to do. He keeps attempting to stumble on paintings and he's over qualified. he's now thinking approximately leaving for Korean because of the fact he had some can provide. He has a spouse and a pair of youngsters, now they must exchange there total existence. each and every of the money he saved for the little ones faculties and stuff. He now has to apply it to help them. we ought to techniques to stop thinking related to the now and related to the destiny. usa has extensive money owed!! we ought to pay them off so our little ones do no longer go through. i'm additionally a militia spouse and that i thoroughly have self assurance that are infantrymen isn't back for a at the same time as. once you vote think of roughly what jobs are going to be attainable to you after all that perplexing paintings of faculty?? once you have youngsters how they're knowledgeable of their loose faculties, are they going to have buses nonetheless waiting to take them, will you be waiting to pay for there scientific costs?? Will yeah single mom get any help from there country?? Obama is thinking related to the destiny no longer only ideal now. occasion: that is like employing a motor vehicle that would not paintings properly. you are able to shop employing it and enable it wreck thoroughly down(are country now), or placed it interior the storage, take the bus till you have saved money to repair it(are country after Obama!!). Who knows you would be waiting to function new rims.
2016-10-16 12:33:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul.... he's the only one that's not tied down in corruption with BIG BUSINESS, which owns the Media.
That's why he's got minimal coverage on major news sites, but the most support from the Internet. Afterall... People on the Internet decided to start a fundraising day ON THEIR OWN (Paul really didn't know), and we managed to raise 4.1 MILLION dollars in 24 hours..
That's a record breaker, and I think I could only find 2 or 3 articles on it from the Media.
The media only supports Hillary or Rudy, because they aren't afraid of those pushovers.
2007-11-14 06:35:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I get a kick out of those on here who call Hillary a socialist. She is a very moderate democrat. Anyway I am voting for her because she has compassion, is tough, smart and I think we may just need a womans approach to solving this mess were in.
She also has access to Bill's brain andexperience and that aint bad!
If she doesn't get the nomination then probably Obama. I would consider Guliani, but he is the only GOP candidate I would even think of voting for this time. We need a new direction.
2007-11-14 06:12:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by rumbler_12 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
Congressman (Dr.) Ron Paul (R-TX) - because I'm sick of the status quo and big government boondoggle and the destruction of our civil liberties. Ron Paul is the most honest and straight-talking politician in Congress who also understands the corruption that is infecting our government.
2007-11-14 06:36:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Think Richly™ 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Just depends on who the party nominees are and if there are any good third party/independant canidates. I don't like Hillary. The only Republican I like is Huckabee, although I would consider Paul. If Chuck Hagle ran third party/independant, he might get my vote. We'll see.
2007-11-14 05:57:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
This question is asked 600 times per day, but I would vote for Clinton. The one with the most money leading everyone in the polls.
2007-11-14 06:01:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
The most qualified, experienced and honest candidate running. John McCain.
Edit:
Don't thumb me bro!
Show me a candidate with more experience and integrity. If you pick that nut Ron Paul, may the ghost of Barry Goldwater vomit on you.
2007-11-14 05:53:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Matt D 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
I would vote for hillary clinton
2007-11-14 14:36:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋