2007-11-14 05:00:11 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Is this the joke question of the day or are you just seeing how many people turn hostile in answering this question?
2007-11-14 06:35:51 · answer #1 · answered by doxie 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course I would. Strong economy. Fought back against terrorists as opposed to Bill Clinton who let four attacks on the US go unpunished. Acts on the best info available and his conscience, not opinion polls. Most ethnically diverse administration in US history. President Bush has been good for this country and history and perspective will reveal that to those out there who don't know yet.
2007-11-14 13:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by Matt D 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Actually... I would.
He'd get the job done... more than Hillary or Guiliani could... and that's more scary than having Bush as president
Just being honest... the war is looking O.K. and a new president could sacrifice that.
The WAR is the biggest issue.
2007-11-14 14:09:33 · answer #3 · answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
He is President of USA, UNITED States OF America, States, America - So many ways we call this country. I am not an American but I want to make my opinion because today's world is ruled by Americans directly or indirectly. So naturally President of America is an important figure not only to Americans but also to most of the countries. So I personally thinks President should be like HIM, LIKE MR. BUSH.
2007-11-14 13:45:59 · answer #4 · answered by Rajrani 2 · 3⤊ 4⤋
We have had 28 years of the same two families, the Bush family and the Clinton family, running America. In my opinion, it's time for a change and I would not vote for either again.
2007-11-14 13:06:22 · answer #5 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 7⤊ 6⤋
NO. I haven't voted for him the past 2 elections, why would I start now?
I'd like to tell the person who wrote that in the last 28 years we've only had 2 families in the white house (Bushs & Clinton) they're wrong George Bush, Sr. (4yrs), George Bush, Jr. (8 yrs) and Clinton (8 yrs), sorry but that isn't the correct math!!! It's only 20 years!
2007-11-14 13:07:27 · answer #6 · answered by sun_shinevt 6 · 7⤊ 7⤋
Abso-freakin-lutely!!!!!
2007-11-14 14:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have to say that I would not vote for him. This country needs a change.
2007-11-14 13:28:08 · answer #8 · answered by hunting_man06 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes.
He may be stubborn in his decisions, stubborn in his fight against terrorism. But, I'm better off than I was 8 years ago.
At least he won't side-step the constitution by having his wife run.
2007-11-14 13:27:00 · answer #9 · answered by Robert S 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I'd have a nervous breakdown if Bush were in office for another four years.
I didn't vote for him in 2000, and I didn't vote for him in 2004.
Never have I distrusted or disliked a president more than Bush. And never has one disappointed me more. Clinton's cigar was close, but nowhere near as bad as Bush's entire presidency. I can't even stand to watch him or listen to him speak anymore.
2007-11-14 13:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 8⤋