It's amazing that Bush supporters can be tolerable to torture people "suspected" of terrorism.
Under the administration's own standards of torturing suspects. Bush is a suspect of terrorism himself!
It is very suspicious that he used 9/11 to implement his policies. And how he opposed a 9/11 investigation in the first place. And how he limited the scope of the investigation when he was forced to have one. His ties to oil companies, war profiteers, and even the Bin Laden family who share same business interests as the Bush family!
If it is ever discovered that he was involved, Bush will be tried and executed for treason (or will he? given that people are die hard fans of Bush). But it will never be discovered that he was involved because an independent and well funded investigation will never take place. There are powers preventing it.
2007-11-14 05:37:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jerry H 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Who is well-known with, the articles would not say why he believes this except the actual undeniable reality that he does. "Cossiga received appreciate from competition activities as actual one of a uncommon breed - an consumer-pleasant flesh presser - and led the country for seven years until eventually April 1992. Cossiga's tendency to be outspoken disillusioned the Italian political institution and he changed into compelled to renounce after revealing the life of, and his section in installation, Operation Gladio - a rogue intelligence community lower than NATO auspices that finished bombings for the time of Europe interior the 60's, 70's and 80's." this does no longer sound like a lot of an consumer-pleasant guy, nor a achieveable one if he's responsible of the very element he's accusing our us of a of doing.
2016-10-24 05:37:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think you meant "waterboarded" (i.e., a form of water torture), which virtually nobody on the planet knows about! "Keelhauled", maybe! "Flogged", a little out-dated. Now, have him hung by his b@lls until he returns every soldier to their home, and have him pay back the trillions spent on a useless war (not to mention the probably millions he made on his or his relatives and cronys' oil gouging profits, and then you'd have something! ;)
The bigger questions are how he got re-elected (nobody's fault but us dumb citizens!), why Congress allowed him to continue to spend billions in this neo-Vietnam (does anybody in Congress know what "checks-and-balances" is for?), and why he wasn't impeached for destroying the very America he was sworn to protect ("to embarrassing for the nation" isn't a valid reason; if Congress could impeach Clinton for adultery, why hasn't Bush been impeached for this ersatz Crusade of his? If it's a choice between a standing President screwing his wife or the nation, I say, the latter is far cheaper and safer!)? ;)
Although Bush was certainly knowledgeable of Iraq's lack of weapons-of-mass-destruction, and, thus, will go down (literally) in history for instigating a war that nobody wanted or can possibly "win", at the needless cost of American lives and billions of dollars, it is the epitomy of ignorance to suggest that any duly elected American official had anything to do with the events leading up to 9/11 (granted, it is POSSIBLE that there was some advanced knowledge that it *could* occur), and you should be ashamed of yourself for suggesting such!
Thus endeth the rant!
2007-11-14 05:40:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by skaizun 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think that the evidence that he was complicit in 9/11 is in no way, shape, or form anything more than pure conjecture. to insist otherwise is downright ridiculous. But in this country, even the mentally-challenged like you can state their opinions.
If you are unhappy with the direction of this country, please take your rhetoric to any number of caliphate states in the Middle east and publicly denounce them. See if Ahmedinejhad is tolerant of your tripe. You'd be dead in a minute. And then you mock this country? You my friend, are the reason ppl think Americans are stupid. Bc a minority of really crazy ones are and the Constitution gives them a voice.
If possible, please emigrate to any other place on the Earth but here.
2007-11-14 04:52:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Matt D 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I could interpret this 2 ways. One way is to understand your little question here as mocking water boarding and the results it gives, which in that case I sort of agree. The other way is to understand the question as you being just another conspiracy theorist who wants to know if ironic justice is in order for Bush. Which you intended to ask, I do not know.
2007-11-14 04:26:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and guess that you're a Ron Paul supporter.
It's funny really, first it was "Bush is an idiot!". Now, it's "Bush is the mastermind of 9/11!". Make up your mind: one or the other!
2007-11-14 04:29:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by IV 4
·
4⤊
6⤋
definately.
put him through everything all those muslims have gone through and are still going through because of him and his concentration camps even normal muslims living every day lives are being tormented in their own way because of this so called muslim terrorist attacks its pretty clear that reprobate bush is behind it
2007-11-14 04:34:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by confused??? 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
No, I object to our enemies treatment, beheading shouldn't be allowed, now you go tell Osama.
2007-11-14 05:51:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
i don't think waterboarding him will work. he's a reptile from sirius, so he probably has some sort of nostrils, or breathing holes towards the top of his head that the person who was waterboarding him wouldn't know about.
2007-11-14 04:23:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
How dare you.
Innocent muslims my ar$e, you cave dwelling degenerate.
Go on, bugger off rash-heed.
2007-11-14 04:34:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5
·
3⤊
3⤋