English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news17.htm

Public opinion service Rasmussen Reports recently released data from its October 12-14 polling that indicates that Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul leads his GOP opponents against Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton among likely voters ages 30-49. He is the leading White House contender for the key demographic, polling higher than Clinton among baby boomers. Congressman Paul polls in at 47%, compared with Clinton's 44%, among likely voters aged 40-49.

2007-11-14 03:49:05 · 16 answers · asked by beesting 6 in Politics & Government Elections

I regret to inform the Ron Paul supporters that the author of this article, a Mr. Jim Kouri {real name???} may have written numbers that are not actual.
I spent several hours @ Rasmussen yesterday, without finding those numbers.
Thank you Elway, for pointing that out.

However here is a recent article you can believe:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071115/ap_po/ron_paul;_ylt=AsW6zUr9FPuyycGm...

[excerpt]
Poole said she found herself agreeing with him on monetary policy, the war and other issues.

"He would turn this country around in the way that it needs to go," said Poole, a semiretired mortgage broker. She and her husband now travel to several states, she said, "promoting him everywhere we go."

2007-11-15 06:41:47 · update #1

16 answers

Sounds fantastic. I know that I and a bunch of my friends and family are all voting for him. It is time to clean up America and get rid of all of the Republican and Democrat corporate whores.

2007-11-14 03:52:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 14 4

NOPE!

I wouldn't vote for Ron Paul and this site outlines many of the reasons why!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20071116/cm_uc_crmchx/op_54409

If you are still looking for a candidate, you may not even choose the party that you are currently thinking about after checking out these sites.

Try it and see who your best match is, it may not even be someone in the party that you traditionally vote within. It only takes a few minutes.

The other sites will help answer any questions about the candidates the issues or the election process. As well as registering, and voting.

http://www.votesmart.org/
1.Presidential Election Resources; including each candidate's voting record and position on all issues.
2.State Presidential Primary Dates
3.How Does the Primary Process Work?
4.Electoral College Votes per State
5.What is the Electoral College?
6.Political Party Information
7.Other Internet Resources

http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html
1.Answer the questions on this site to find the 2008 presidential candidate that best aligns with your beliefs.
2.It only takes three to five minutes!
3.You may also “Click” an issue to LEARN more about it and discuss it with other voters.
4.Which 2008 Presidential Candidate Agrees With You?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21116732
1.This site compares candidates and issues in matrix form.
2.You can vote for your candidate by issue on this site.

http://www.answers.com/topic/united-states-presidential-election-2008?cat=tec...

This is yet another site for information on the 2008 election!

http://www.declareyourself.com/?
gclid=CO7IkrDO3Y8CFQHHIgodCz5P0w

Absentee Ballot Request and more 411!

VOTE TO KEEP AMERICA SAFE

2007-11-17 18:48:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

the a number of opinion polls selection particularly extensively. finally, what's mandatory for a candidate to proceed working is finance and business enterprise. Assuming that Romney wins large in New Hampshire, it relies upon on what happens in South Carolina. actual, human beings are not prepared to financially help a campaign for terribly long if their candidate isn't triumphing or performing nicely. Gingrich is faltering, yet his vicious assaults against Romney would reason the race to open up. finally, i think of it truly is Romney's race to lose, yet he won't be prevalent enthusiastically by using many interior the Republican occasion.

2016-10-02 08:30:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am ecstatic that Ron Paul's campaign is attracting so
many younger voters .I hope that the poll signals the
fact that Ron Paul will garner more votes during primary and caucus season than previously thought .Go Ron Paul go !!!!

2007-11-14 15:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hmm... Went to Rasmussen and this heading was what I was greeted with, showing the latest poll results:

Election 2008: Clinton 42% Giuliani 39% Ron Paul 8%
Wednesday, November 14, 2007

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/election_2008_clinton_42_giuliani_39_ron_paul_8

And in searching for your stats on Rasmussen with a fine tooth comb here's what I found, which gives a quite different story about Paul and Clinton:

Poll Matching Hillary Clinton and Ron Paul Tells A Lot About Clinton, Little About Paul
Sunday, October 28, 2007
A recent Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey featuring a match-up between Hillary Clinton and Ron Paul highlights one of the perils that comes from overanalyzing poll results between candidates with different levels of name recognition.

In that survey, Clinton held a fairly modest 48% to 38% lead. But, a careful look at the results tells us a lot about the public’s opinion of Hillary Clinton and virtually nothing about their opinion of Ron Paul.

As for Ron Paul, 42% don’t know enough about him to have an opinion one way or the other. He’s one of 435 Congressman whose life is way below the radar screen for most Americans.

A look at the crosstabs demonstrates that it is attitudes towards Clinton that are driving the numbers in this polling match-up. Among all voters, Clinton attracts 48% support. Among the voters who have never heard of Ron Paul or don’t know enough to have an opinion, guess what. Clinton attracts the exact same total--48% of the vote. So whether or not people have heard of Ron Paul as the challenger, support for Clinton doesn’t change.

Among the 51% who have heard of Ron Paul but don’t have a Very Favorable opinion of him, Clinton attracts 49% of the vote.

The only noticeable difference to be found is among that very small slice of the electorate that has a Very Favorable opinion of Paul. Seven percent (7%) of the nation’s voters fit this description and they prefer the Texas Congressman over the Democratic frontrunner by a 70% to 27% margin.

So, outside of a small group of avid Ron Paul fans, support for Senator Clinton is unchanged whether or not the survey respondent has ever heard of Ron Paul.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/2008_presidential_election/poll_matching_hillary_clinton_and_ron_paul_tells_a_lot_about_clinton_little_about_paul

~~~~~~~~~~
In conclusion, it would be great if you had an actual Rasmussen link to the information you've given us. Try as I might, I could find nothing about it on their website. Perhaps I somehow missed it and you will be more skilled at finding this nugget on their website. If it is the most recent polling result, it should be easy to obtain. Thanks.

2007-11-14 05:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Nice. I will just add that if this election turns out to be another farse the people need to revolt because this could be the last chance for an honest government.. Keep an eye on the electoral colleges.
Giuliani is stick a fork in him done. This Kerik scandal will be his undoing. I see a Paul vs Clinton in our future.

2007-11-14 04:25:51 · answer #6 · answered by Enigma 6 · 5 3

It's a great indicator! I'm sure as more people get to know him, more often than not, they will support or consider him 2nd choice. He's officially polling 5 and 6% nationwide according to CNN opinion polls and Zogby respectively (phone polls, which I still consider archaic, but there is no better method presented).

He's close to beating out Thompson and McCain, and above Huckabee in Nevada, and should be at 15-18% soon in NH (according to Zogby, on a Sean Hannity interview, boy did Sean look dumbfounded!)

EDIT: Sorry Ron is at 7% according to Zogby, a jump from 1% to 7%, that's incredible!
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/mitt-romney-gaining-in-nevada-ron-paul-strong-zogby.html

2007-11-14 03:59:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

Here is the actual poll 47% Hillary 39% Giuliani, and 8% Paul
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/
I am not sure why you spinned this article for Paul, I mean I like Paul and will vote for him, but Hillary leads Guiliani, and Paul. I will probably vote for Clinton, if Paul doesnt win primaries....
But....
lol
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/

2007-11-14 04:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

"Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who can beat Hillary Clinton," claims political strategist Kent Snyder.

You've gotta love that quote.

RP08

2007-11-14 04:11:22 · answer #9 · answered by idontknow 3 · 7 3

He'd be a shoe-in if nobody but people age 30-49 were allowed to vote.

2007-11-14 03:53:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8 4

fedest.com, questions and answers