Short answers such as "oil, hegemony, mistaken intelligence, WMDs" don't seem to be satisfactory these days. Any solid evidence/reasoning/sources?
2007-11-14
03:43:22
·
4 answers
·
asked by
J B
2
in
News & Events
➔ Current Events
Oh, sorry, humanitarian reasons are out as well. No interest being shown in Sudan, Myanmar, etc. As well as the fact that (even though unintentionally) hundreds of thousands of Iraqis (over 300k according to the UN) have been killed since the opening of the war. Saddam was a tortuous murderer for sure, but we make him look like a joke.
2007-11-14
04:22:28 ·
update #1
Hmm, 9/11, yeah I saw something about that. Then I also remember hearing (even directly from Bush's mouth) that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. But, yeah there were a few training camps, as there are in other countries, even in the State of Oregon! And now the whole place is a terrorist incubator and inspiration to aspiring radical leaders/suicide bombers. That's the implied justification they used to get you to support it. I was hoping to get the real reason, not one that's been severely debunked.
2007-11-15
04:11:37 ·
update #2