http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=An01YRWJX1IrT4n9JyLBwCLsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071114075248AAzMbBb
2007-11-14 03:16:38 · 6 answers · asked by TD Euwaite? 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Poetry
Thanks for the compliment. ;-)
2007-11-14 03:21:52 · answer #1 · answered by Dark Dickinsonian 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope, she is wrong but I say this, it depends on much, like if we have a nuclear war where even the cockroaches die off as well as all things in the ocean. I guess that is possible. But the earth has survived mass extinctions before, however, WE may not survive, but the earth will most likely go on.
2007-11-14 03:41:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes, Moonbelle is right, and we already made a pretty good start. Unfortunately, extinction of species is the rule, NOT exception. We are dancing on our grave, but are too arrogant to see it. The world will survive, it looks like we will not.
2007-11-14 03:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The arrogance of man.
Yellow stone!
Asteroid!
Is the question destroy mankind, then the answer is yes.
The world does not "need" mankind.
It managed before and it will after.
2007-11-14 03:33:41 · answer #4 · answered by TWOBOB 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Moonbelle is right and there is nothing to add to what she said so beautifully.
2007-11-14 03:24:36 · answer #5 · answered by Lady Annabella-VInylist 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"We" are well on our way, I'm afraid.....
2007-11-14 03:41:03 · answer #6 · answered by Reenie: Mom of Marine 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋