English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

yes, 9-11 happened because he ignored all the warnings he was given even by the previous clinton administration

on top of that instead of taking out Osama we invaded Iraq and gave the terrorists hundreds of thousands of targets (troops) to kill right in thier own back yard

this was excactly what Osama dreamed of!

now that the war is (apparently) winding down in Iraq expect another attack on the US mainland soon

2007-11-13 23:30:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

That would be a big NO!

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 5,000 people in New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C. who are now dead would be alive today.

AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question. There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism. That being the case, why is it that the Clinton Administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than Osama bin Laden?

THINK ABOUT IT!
It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath!

2007-11-13 23:45:38 · answer #2 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 0 2

Technically, yes. He became responsible for national defense the day he was sworn into office, and 9\11 happened after that. So technically YES.

2007-11-13 23:26:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yes, he is responsible for the 9/11 deaths on his watch and the four thousand killed in Iraq.

2007-11-13 23:30:13 · answer #4 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2 2

Since 9/11 there hasn't been any attack here.

You have to also ask yourself why do so many of the DNC deny that there is such a thing as Muslim terrorists.

Why they want to stop Bush from going on the attack?

I would check you air supply Darth it is affecting your thinking.

2007-11-13 23:30:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Probably not but how many feel the world is a safer place because of Bush.

2007-11-13 23:38:27 · answer #6 · answered by molly 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers