Why can the US possess nuclear weapons but other nations (like Iran and N. Korea) cannot?

Question

How is it that the USA and other nations (such as France, Russia, India, and Israel) can possess nuclear weapons (AKA "Weapons of Mass Destruction"), but other nations may not?

Answer 1

When the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty came about the UK, USA and USSR were the only nuclear weapons nations. France and the People's Republic of China signed and ratified the treaty after they developed nuclear weapons. Israel, Pakistan and India have refused to sign the treaty. All other nations have. North Korea withdrew from the treaty after being caught breaking it in 2003. Iran remains a signatory.
Hence for these nations to develop nuclear weapons is to break a treaty that they entered into freely.

Answer 2

First, you do not attack a rustic that has nuclear weapons, whether they're much less effective than those you have. the prospect is only too great. North Korea's acquisition of nuclear weapons has shielded them from any form of preemptive attack. If Iran is able to enhance nuclear weapons till now somebody destroys their centers, they can be proof against attack. The opposite is real, too, nonetheless. Iran and North Korea will by no capacity attack any nuclear-possessing or nuclear-allied united states of america with the aid of fact the prospect of nuclear war is only too great. 2d, they sell them. North Korea sells all of its technologies. If Iran ever develops nuclear weapons, they in all probability will sell them too. it rather is a lots greater effective danger to the different nuclear powers. in the event that they sell their weapons to terrorists, the doctrine of at the same time certain destruction will become virtually beside the point. Terrorists do not belong to a minimum of one united states of america, or maybe one area. If terrorists have been to spark off nuclear weapons in the U. S., the U. S. does not have the capacity to justify nuclear retaliation against the rustic or international places the place the terrorists stay, with the aid of fact the determination to apply those weapons develop into not sanctioned by utilising the government. Even the war in Afghanistan is arguable, with the aid of fact the Taliban did not formally help Al Qaeda. And that war has brought about fewer civilian deaths than a nuclear war might.

Answer 3

The other nations can.

They just have to decide, would they rather have nuclear weapons,

Or have normal relations with the US, Russia, China, Britian and France.

Because no nation has the right to to have normal trade relations with any other nation.

If that nation, doesn't wanna trade with them.

North Korea decided they would rather have trade and normal relations, rather than have nuclear weapons.

Now Iran must make the same choice.

Which would they rather have, normal relations or nuclear weapons.

Answer 4

US is a selfish superpower and it does not want other countries like Iran and North Korea to be powerful like it by denying development and possession of nuclear weapons.

Answer 5

These countries have no freewill. They are not allowed to think for themselves and have been taught from birth that we are there enemies. Do you really want people like that to have weapons of mass destruction?

Answer 6

Read the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

Answer 7

Iran and North Korea have openly stated that they wish to use nukes to destro the west.

Answer 8

Superior expertise, advanced technology and without question more experience and wisdom and responsibility to maintain them, thats why. Those fools will end up blowing up somebody.

Answer 9

We have had Nuclear weapons and have restrained ourselves for 40+ years without using them.

Answer 10

all can posses some use for good some use for bad and some are not placed in safe hands, or may be afraid to get it back