Hey, don't laugh it could happen! The executive orders are in place (PD 51) that says he could declare martial law, suspend elections just like our great ally Pakistan and become a dictator in case of a "national emergency."
What do ya say guys, four more years?!? Wasn't that the motto during the last election?
2007-11-13 16:46:47 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The idea is enough to make one literally ill.
Now I can finally appreciate why our forefathers added the second ammendment to the constitution. I think it was just for this reason.
#####
Edit:
It's funny how your sarcasm was missed by a few. Also, I think George is on Yahoo! again giving everyone who doesn't want a third term, a thumbs down!!! lol...
2007-11-13 23:41:11 · answer #1 · answered by TJTB 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i'm an Obama supporter and those are my ideas: i admire Ron Paul even in spite of the undeniable fact that i do no longer unavoidably consider Libertarianism and the 1st one to aim it is going to probable see severe aftereffects and the assumption will bypass down in flames. i'm thirty years previous and this can be the 1st election I vote in. I even have continually felt that there is a 2 celebration phantasm in this u . s . and the prosperous positioned who they want in workplace. It actual scares me that Obama have been given as far as he has and yet, he seems so actual. How did he injury for the duration of the duality? Ron Paul could have been a plenty greater advantageous opponent for Obama and would desire to have made him sweat a sprint. i do no longer know how McCain is so severe in the polls whilst Bush replaced into so low. i assume people as a rule are stupid and that's the comparable people who voted for Bush 2 situations! Republicans know in the event that they vote for Ron Paul it will be a wasted vote, that's why Independents don't get many votes. they are afraid in the event that they advance some balls and vote for him, that the worser of the assumed 2 evils gets the white homestead. till we can persuade greater people to vote self sufficient and stay remote from the events, this duality will proceed.
2016-12-16 08:07:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would mean W W III, if Bush remained the president after 2008. I don't think so. And Hillary Rodham Clinton would mean pretty much the same but worse. And Ron Paul simply doesn't have a chance.
2007-11-13 18:33:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
it is oh too possible and scary. i have been hearing things like that for the past two years. i think something big is going to shake up america- and bad too. i am staying as positive as i can in it all and giving some effort to ron pauls' campaign. he has my vote- if we can get there.
2007-11-14 02:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by trooper753 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I have said this before that I don't believe Bush/Cheney would give up their power reign of terror and I truly believe they will declare martial law only AFTER another terrorist attack before elections!
2007-11-13 17:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
no ill still vote Ron Paul.
the thing about that executive order is that it was power the congress already had , why didn't they challenge it. why are they not screaming to the public. they are as guilty as him
2 failed party's 1 failed policy
2007-11-13 17:45:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I just hate it that you are absolutely correct, and I wouldn't put it past him to create an "emergency". His future income, I believe, and that of Cheney, depends on continuation of this war of greed. I'm getting nauseous, just thinking about such a possibility!
2007-11-13 16:57:51 · answer #7 · answered by ArRo 6 · 9⤊ 4⤋
I don't think he would openly do that unless it couldn't be traced back to him but it is possible.
2007-11-13 17:12:20 · answer #8 · answered by Timothy C 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Nice try...but your conspiracy idea isn't even a theory...theories require SOME basis of facts to extrapolate on.
Pit down the koolaid, you have had MORE than enough !
2007-11-13 17:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 2⤊ 7⤋
And executive orders supersede the Constitution how again?
2007-11-13 16:50:23 · answer #10 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 5⤊ 7⤋