Can any republican explain time travel to me?

Question

how did the BBC report the 3rd world trade center building fell.

no let me rephrase that:

how did the BBC report the 3rd world trade center fell....20 minutes before it actually did???

was it just the fac that the other 2 WTC buildings were struck by planes, and this one wasn't that just made a good guess?

is that what it was? did the BBC just make a "good guess" based on the fact that 2 buildings were stuck by planes, that any good guesser would figure a 3rd building to magically fall? and they guessed it 20 minutes before it actually did?

amazing.

i wish teh republican bush supporters would explain time travel by the BBC to us all. And for that matter how 3 buldings fell with the same charges imploding al 3 bulidings, yet only 2 were struck by planes.

hmm...they all had charges that were the same. 2 planes flew. and a report 20 minutes prior to the actuall felling of the building.

Magic?

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=98g63YSYxLo

please people DO NOT BELEIVE what smsmith500 said. watch the video for yourself. the reporter says the building is gone she says you can see the empty space behind her where the 3rd bulding was.

smsmith500 is trying to blind you and not let you hear and see the truth. Also- so what if youtube is the source. it is nothing more than a vault for stuff. i suppose the source could be cartoon network. it's just the location not the information. youtube , beef sandwich, rugby, who cares, the pont is it ust hapens to be the storage space of the news article. dont let smsmith500 or others blind you.

well folks- go listen to the boradcast. don't take my word for it. I am not mis interpreting the boradcasters. they say the Suliman building has collapsed...not is going to collape.

bu you see this is how righty works. even when the fact and truth is right in front of you they lie so much hping you will beleive them.

watcht the video- the very first thing the man discusses is the sulivan building HAS COLLAPSED.

sorry rightys- your lies are not shielding the truth.

Answer 1

You might want to check out what the BBC has to say about this claim that they reported such a thing, and the conspiracy around it. Unless you think they are in on it too of course.

I am a Democrat, not a Republican. It doesn't take a Republican to disbelieve the conspiracy theorists. Most Democrats don't believe it either. A great many of us believe that some facts regarding the who's, what's and when's about that day have been carefully pruned and presented to us - but most just do not believe that 9/11 was our own government's conspiracy. In fact, we have to spend way too much time fighting the right wing poking us with a stick and suggesting we are ALL conspiracy theorists because of a few of them in the far left of our party. It's really annoying.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.html

Answer 2

Time travel is logically impossible, because it's only possible at light speed. Any object attaining light speed (any bit of matter, not energy) would then attain "infinite mass," and would immediately obliterate the universe. Or something. Einstein explains this far better than I.
As far as 9/11 being orchestrated by our government, most every sane person knows these are patently false - it's well documented that these 4 airplanes were hijacked by well-trained, well-financed terrorists being sheltered in Afganistan.

Do you really think our government, or elements of our government, would be able to conceal any role they had in this? Hillary Clinton can't even engage in insider trading (pork bellies) without everyone knowing. Cheney and Bush can't even conceal DWI's!! Do you seriously believe they caused 9/11, and somehow got away with it? Truly?
I've seen ground zero and I know people who died in the towers. They were killed by Islamofacist terrorists, period. I realize that some people feel that Arabs, Muslims, and the Middle East are always victims of whitey - I think this view is at best naive and at worst very dangerous to the security of western democracy.
And the notion that there was some kind of inside plot is so insane and kooky that I'm not even offended.
Do a lot of people suggest you need professional help? Medication, therapy, maybe a little time off for a rest? If so, strongly consider everyone else's point of view. You might be a little off, kiddo.

Answer 3

The BBC reported that the building was expected to fall. Not that it did. You should be very careful using youtube as a source for "news".

Answer 4

Riiiiiight. The Liberal media, (who despise all things Consevative) were given a script to read from before the attack happened. And rather than destroy the Bush administration by telling the whole world that it was an inside job, they just played along with the whole thing. Please, do us all a favor, put your tin foil hat back on and lie down.

Answer 5

Listen to the report next time. It doesn't say what you are claiming.

Seriously.... using YouTube as a source? Ranks right up there with Wikipedia

Answer 6

What??? Is this an attempt at some lefty conspiracy nut theory?

I can predict the future too....you will vote for Hillary Clinton in 2008. See, all the Republicans can predict the future, do you feel left out?

Answer 7

Just another misinformed conspiracy theorist. You should apply for membership in the crackpots-R-Us club.

Answer 8

Obviously your delusions have affected your hearing

Answer 9

the government did it! (whistling theme from twighlight zone)...

Answer 10

Why? Your mind is made up already.