2007-11-13 15:00:17 · 10 answers · asked by Choco 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
and for Israel's security.?
2007-11-13 15:00:50 · update #1
Israel "Clean Break Papers" under Clinton written by the usual Zionist criminals, Wolfowitz, Perle, Wurmser, Libby, ect. Clinton thought these plans were a bit "extreme" and he didn't approve of them. This is around the time when the Lewinsky scandal came out.
Even Bush 41 called these people "crazies in the basement."
Dig it!!!
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Do_you_smell_what_I_smell_911_and_Israel
2007-11-13 15:47:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
properly George Bush could have not attacked Iraq in the 1st place. there became into no reason to. (they did no longer have weapons of mass destruction, or chemical weapons, and are not development colleges there). i will fairly evaluate this a conflict simply by fact over a million million Iraqi harmless Iraqi civilians died from getting bombed or shot or perhaps crueler techniques. additionally i do no longer think. George Bush went to conflict in 2003 simply by fact he nonetheless it would not take very long to take administration of Iraq, he concept it would probable take in undemanding terms some days. i do no longer think that Israel is against the conflict in any respect, saying Israel is the entire reason the U. S. is in the conflict. that is no longer a conspiracy concept that united statesa. went there for the oil. You do understand that the U. S. is controlling lots of the oil springs in Iraq? that is no longer a conspiracy. additionally it is exciting that the U. S. intervenes in Libya yet no longer Syria? One enormous clarification, oil. saying the two one in all those countries are having a similar problems with there leaders, yet one enormous distinction is that Syria has no oil. additionally what are you speaking approximately revenge for George Bush's father? George Bush screwed up Iraq in 1990 blocking off Iraq, barley even letting the tooth paste or perhaps tires in. This killed over a million million harmless Iraqi Civilians. He in undemanding terms went there simply by fact he observed that Iraq became into starting to be too effective in the middle East, and did no longer like it. I additionally locate it form of humorous which you say you will block each and every physique that mentions something approximately oil simply by fact they are not conspiracy's yet they seem to be a huge reason for the conflict, so is Israel. additionally i come across it infantile which you say you % "commonplace human beings." and the type you will block them in the event that they actually consider you. you're ignorant.
2016-11-11 11:05:07 · answer #2 · answered by joerling 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it's about the oil, it's always been about the oil. Bush borrowed money from Osama Bin Laden to start his first oil company. Scientists and the oil companies have known for a long time about Peak Oil. The data showed that oil production would peak around 2005. I would say with the insiders knowledge of the Peak Oil data Bush had to have known. Thus the plot to start a war in the middle-east. They also knew sooner or later the oil wars would start. They say it's about the oil. Iraq says it's about the oil. Gas prices continue to rise because production is costing more.
http://www.oilempire.us/
Peak Oil and the NAU
http://www.energybulletin.net/23816.html
Oh yeah remember how Saddam lit the oil wells as soon as the US started bombing them and whats the first thing the US secured in Iraq........the oil.
I would say Bush, his daddy and his oily friends have been planning it for a long time all the way back to when he was a governor.
2007-11-13 15:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by Enigma 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hm..... If we were getting more oil out of it, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be paying over $3.00 a gallon.
We're protecting Israel? At least Bush is doing something right.
2007-11-13 15:05:02 · answer #4 · answered by Little Red Hen 2.0 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
During the Clinton presidency when we were being attacked by Muslim fanatics and all Bill could think about was fooling around with interns instead of fighting back.
2007-11-13 15:47:11 · answer #5 · answered by Kingler 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It wasn't about the oil friend.
It was about having a long term military presence in the Middle East.
Like Germany or S. Korea or Turkey or Japan or etc, etc.
And we will be there a loooong time...
2007-11-13 15:09:52 · answer #6 · answered by Bye for now... 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No Clinton did.
2007-11-13 16:15:58 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wait, there was a plan?
2007-11-13 15:08:08 · answer #8 · answered by S P 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
years ago sweety
2007-11-13 15:12:37 · answer #9 · answered by Cyrus 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If so, then where is it?
2007-11-13 15:47:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋