... or chunky/chubby?
Personally I think she was perfect but I keep hearing over and over that she was fat
http://www.metroactive.com/papers/sfmetro/12.20.99/gifs/sayles-9949.jpg
What do you think?
2007-11-13 12:04:04 · 17 answers · asked by marm212 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
She wasn't fat....it's just that the pressure nowadays for women is to be super skinny and that's not healthy! All these models/actresses/etc nowadays should be held to the standards of years before....they were much healthier looking back then.
2007-11-13 12:09:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She wasn't fat, she was the perfect weight. I think that, translated into today's sizes, she would be an 8 or a 10. Definitely not overweight.
2007-11-13 20:10:00 · answer #2 · answered by Vae 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not Hardly she was very small she had asexy figure that all the stick people need to know that she was not fat. Ask most men will tell you they like curves.
2007-11-13 20:18:05 · answer #3 · answered by Cowgirl lost seahorse 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chunky
2007-11-13 20:07:32 · answer #4 · answered by •♣•Ninja•♣• •♣•Bunny•♣• 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
She was actually a size 12, but I don't think she looked like it at all.
2007-11-13 20:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. She was what would be a size 16 today, but that's just curvy - women (generally) are supposed to have busts and hips!
2007-11-13 20:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by Tufty M 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think she was perfect. Absolutely beautiful.
2007-11-13 20:08:12 · answer #7 · answered by Jupe 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I do not think that she was. She was bigger than most actresses that we see today. But I do not think that she was fat.
2007-11-13 20:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by Tony M 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Her Reubenesque figure was in fashion when she was popular... I don't think she was fat.
2007-11-13 20:33:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
she had a nice body...not too thin and def. not fat.
2007-11-13 20:08:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋