English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

nash and his suns are better than deron and the jazz talentwise, but i have to say the combo of deron/boozer is better than nash/amare mainly bec of the unbelievable chemistry between the jazz duo (next gen of stockton/malone).. im a die hard steve nash fan and i hate to say this..

2007-11-13 10:04:59 · 7 answers · asked by stevenashty21 2 in Sports Basketball

7 answers

Deron and Boozer hands down are the better of the two. Boozer is more physically gifted, he can go with both hands, he can rebound, he can also play defense something that Suns absolutely can't do. Deron Williams averages more assists, plays better D, is tougher, can score at will if he needs too, hits his free throws, and doesn't turn the ball over as much!
Nash can't play d, is a wimp, flops when trying to foce a turnover instead of actually playing d, turns the ball over way too much! Amare is more skillfull then he is powerful, if he really wanted to get dominant he would need to work on his defense a lot more, get physically stronger so he can bang with the likes of Boozer!

2007-11-13 22:08:59 · answer #1 · answered by Steven R 6 · 0 0

I am a huge Amare fan but, I will have to say that the combination of deron and boozer would have to better. They just have such good chemistry. Boozer always knows where deron is and deron always knows where boozer is.

2007-11-13 10:53:22 · answer #2 · answered by rgames4u2 2 · 1 0

Nash and Amare simply because of how good Nash is. So I would have to disagree with you. One thing I will say is that both combos are damn good.

See why people are calling RootZoo the best site online for sports fans. Head on over and as this question there, you’ll get the best responses.

http://66.135.44.72 (or RootZoo.com)

.

2007-11-13 10:09:57 · answer #3 · answered by Bob B 1 · 0 1

I would say the Nash/Amare combo is better because nobody does the pick & roll better than those 2

2007-11-13 10:48:15 · answer #4 · answered by Antwuan (Giants Superbowl XLVI Champs!!!) 7 · 0 1

Woah, what's with all the Queen vs Zeppelin questions? Have I neglected something? It feels as though 2 of my maximum suitable pals are struggling with... stay help... Queen have been only "WOW" they outplayed each and every different band there. stay help replaced into all approximately Queen to be trouble-free (musically speaking, i'm no longer ignoring the completed reason it replaced into particularly produced...), Zeppelin do no longer stand of challenge in this actual conflict. I accept as true with you one hundred% right here, Zeppelin do sound sloppy... yet even of their absolute best, Zeppelin might nevertheless be thoroughly eclipsed by using Freddie's point presence on my own. and that i'm no longer asserting this because of the fact they are my widespread band, my opinion is shaped from an purpose attitude. My answer is that Queen, indisputably, are the greater helpful stay performers.

2016-10-16 10:12:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ofcourse nash/amare
it's true that both deron and boozer are getting better
but for now, they cant beat nash and amare yet

2007-11-13 12:29:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nash And Amarie

2007-11-13 10:58:08 · answer #7 · answered by Buckethead 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers