2007-11-13 09:25:40 · 8 answers · asked by sajyo2003 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
They are both bastards, but Musharraf is a friendly bastard
2007-11-13 09:31:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Musharraf has actual nukes, he hasn't been in power nearly as long as Sadam was, he's still nominally an ally, has not been targetted by US missle strikes yet, has at least one rival for power whom he left alive, and hasn't, as yet, used poison gas on Kurds (or anyone else I'm aware of). Oh, and he hasn't been lynched by the Mahdi Army.
But, they are both military dictators, which I'm sure is what you were getting at.
2007-11-13 17:36:50 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Musharraf harbors al queda, Saddam never did.
2007-11-13 17:31:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
One is a pseudo Democratically elected President of a Sovereign Nation.
The other is a pseudo Democratically elected President of a Sovereign Nation.
Oh, wait....
One has a mustache, darn....
OK, one has WMD's and supports terrorists, one is dead and had no WMD's anymore, and killed terrorists for sport and hobby.
2007-11-13 17:36:20 · answer #4 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan has nukes!
2007-11-13 17:56:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In addition to the first answer, I'd also say that one of them actually has nuclear weapons.
2007-11-13 17:31:25 · answer #6 · answered by freedom first 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not much.... both were funded by the U.S. at one time or another... Boy can we pick them!
2007-11-13 17:37:51 · answer #7 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
pakistan has nukes.
2007-11-13 18:27:49 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋