English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Wow the president really was a divider!

They have all mostly all voted for the Iraq war
They have all continued to fund the war and refuse to bring the troops home
They have all voted to strip us of our constitutional rights with laws like the Patriot Act, and the John Warner Defense Authorization Act
They have pretty much allowed the president to spy on citizens
They have mostly agreed that we should torture
They have pretty much all agreed that we should not impeach or even censure the (p)resident and vice (p)resident
They all pretty much agree that black box voting is perfectly acceptable
They have all pretty much agreed that campaign finance fraud and cronyism is perfectly acceptable
They have all pretty much agreed that all of our jobs should go to China and that China can export poisonous goods Americans

2007-11-13 08:29:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

A very objective way to look at it. I can't help but agree with the deductions perceived. Does this have to do with all members of congress being in the very wealthy column & wanting to preserve their position for themselves & the members of their family that follow? Does preserving that wealth also includes a need to preserve their hold on the conditions that gives them that wealth? Throughout history, all those in power over nations also accumulated large amounts of wealth at the expense of the people. wealth & power go hand in hand. Is it just a coincidence that all the people in government are wealthy? The proponents of wealth line the stages in their debates proclaiming their desire to make your life better. No matter who is elected, nothing really changes in the lives of the common people, except that things do get worse( cost of living, fighting wars for the wealthy to gain more wealth, health care for fewer people, loss of individual rights)! Is their a real difference in the major contenders for the leader of America? Is your life going to really change no matter who wins? The political population does work well together when they are working for the benefit of themselves. Keep voting these same people back into office, what you saw yesterday you will see tomorrow. What you see is what you get.

2007-11-14 00:05:32 · answer #1 · answered by peepers98 4 · 1 0

I accept as true with you ordinarily. There are too many regulations and rules that can no longer nor should not be legislated. Morality despite the fact that if it is to be a distinctive function in any respect must be by using decision. What good existence have I lived if the only reason I in no way smoked pot replaced into that it replaced into unlawful? That being stated I do think of that regulations do serve some widespread good. they supply a physique artwork to the social contract. the place because it won't be undesirable element if I as somebody lie an my taxes, if jointly all of us do it there is substantial widespread social harm. The device we've facilitates a representative democracy to return to a call which issues must be regulated be they left or precise on the spectrum. All regulations are consistent with some theory device (which contain i think contacts must be enforced) some we conform to greater extremely only than others. What i think the genius of the form is the framework it provides for protections from the tyranny of the final public. Our government is desperate as much as be ineffective to zealots on the left and precise. it is intentionally sluggish shifting for the top concerns you voice. desire that facilitates.

2016-10-16 09:54:22 · answer #2 · answered by ocain 4 · 0 0

even if there was precedent-- whats' strange is that this just isn't the US but in many western "Democracies" there's a similar no-difference none-choice for the electorate between the parties in Government and those in "opposition".

There's a de facto single party system --backed up in most cases privately owned media-- across the developed world. There's a global totalitarianism taking shape in front of us if we're prepared to see it.

2007-11-13 11:08:36 · answer #3 · answered by celvin 7 · 1 0

There was no time that the Democrats and Republicans had come to terms because they have opposite platforms. Anyway, every after election, the government operates as one entity except for some bickerings in the halls of Congress.

2007-11-13 08:36:42 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

They've been working great together since they got the income tax passed and eliminated all third party competition.

2007-11-13 08:36:24 · answer #5 · answered by freedom first 5 · 1 0

Hey bet you could work for NPR

2007-11-13 09:58:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0 2

You're right. This is a terrible place to live. If I were you I would catch the first flight to Cuba or the next tramp steamer to China!

2007-11-13 08:39:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 6

yes, ww2

2007-11-13 08:41:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you are obviously mis informed beyond hope

2007-11-13 08:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by richardbrendawalsh 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers