2007-11-13 08:20:13 · 6 answers · asked by mae 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television ➔ Reality Television
yes of all those seasons it been on the air Taylor Hicks is the only one that would get my votes.
if they do go to pay voting it should be like in mini-cds sells.
each week the one that sells the least cd goes home.
2007-11-13 20:13:39 · answer #1 · answered by doUno 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote..... nothing is worth having to pay for it..... and with the lack of talent in the last season, I surely wouldn't have voted.
What I think they should do is what they do with Dancing With The Stars. You should be able to vote online, and also, half the votes should come from the judges and the other half the public and they should only get so many votes per night.....
2007-11-13 20:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Debby T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would. It's still a popularity contest. So is Dancing With The Stars. People would vote for who they want to, especially if they're paying for it. They just may not be willing to pay for voting more than once.
2007-11-13 16:28:27 · answer #3 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it would change the way I vote. If I had to pay to vote for someone on reality tv, I wouldnt vote at all!
2007-11-13 16:24:52 · answer #4 · answered by Nik 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I had to pay once or twice a week for all 12 weeks, I wouldn't vote at all!!
2007-11-13 16:57:42 · answer #5 · answered by Royle33 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it would change the way i vote. i wouldn't vote at all!!!
it would be silly if they did that. hopefully they will never do that
2007-11-13 17:21:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋