Is it a copyright infringement if I use a graphic of an old painting?

Question

I want to use the graphic of the Mona Lisa in my computer program and documentation.

The computer program may be sold or it may be just used in a government department in the future.

Answer 1

it's up to you if you want too...

Answer 2

COPYRIGHT Copyright applies to all seen arts - drawings, paintings, digital paintings, pictures, sculptures, and so on. in accordance to the copyright regulations, the valid copyright proprietor has the unique proper to do and to authorize proper right here: a million. Reproduce or make copies of the paintings 2. practice by-product works depending upon the unique paintings 3. Distribute the paintings to the generic public through sale, condominium, employ, lending, or move possession 4. demonstrate the paintings publicly in case you probably did not create the unique paintings, you're literally not the valid copyright proprietor. if you're basically copying the paintings on your human being entertainment and purely exhibiting it to friends and relatives it extremely is tremendous, yet when you're reproducing the paintings in diverse parts, arising by-product works, promoting the paintings for money, or letting the generic public view the paintings (which includes posting the paintings on the internet, and so on....) it extremely is copyright infringement and the copyright proprietor has the right to take legal action hostile to you. check out the copyright workplace valid internet website for extra training! Google search for the words "U.S. Copyright workplace" to locate the web website. yet another factor to guage is, will your paintings extremely be a copyright infringement???? that is alright to apply human beings's concepts/creations for thought with a view to create your own unique paintings. yet bear in options, your paintings won't be able to be a by-product, in different words, will human beings be able to inform it extremely is "such and such" paintings you copied? Will your paintings be similiar to the unique paintings? if so, then it ought to nonetheless be a copyright infringement. If the paintings is contained in the "public area" you could recreate it without consequences. How paintings turns into contained in the "public area": a million. The artist forfeited their psychological sources rights and is permitting all and sundry to apply their paintings. 2. psychological sources rights have expired. once the artist dies, tack on an more suitable 50 years or 70 years (will be a lot less or extra years, diverse international places have diverse regulations, will favor to be sure what u . s . the paintings changed into copyrighted in). After 50 years or 70 years have exceeded, the paintings will be utilized through all and sundry. caution: After the artist dies, their sources or heirs would take over sources rights which may forestall all and sundry from utilising their paintings even notwithstanding 50 years or 70 years have exceeded.

Answer 3

I don't think anyone owns the copyright to the Mona Lisa. If yo choose to use it, yo might want to consider changing at least 10% of the original. This will get you out of the copyright laws if any apply.

Answer 4

No, the Mona Lisa is LONG out of copyright.

BUT.... where are you going to get the image? The photo of the Mona Lisa you use probably IS copyright.

Best to go to a stock photos web site, and buy a license. It's not expensive.

Richard

Answer 5

Depends on how old the painting is. Most works over a few hundred years old (and some much younger), become what is known as "public domain." For example, there is no copyright on Shakespeare's work, or Michaelangelo's, or ancient Roman artwork. You'd have to check on the individual works you want to use. Hope that helps.