What's your argument?
2007-11-13 08:16:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
As an atheist I don't really have an argument against that, except to say that one should be careful not to oversimplify religion, its effects or its psychological foundations.
The god used as the answer to "life, the universe and everything" is increasingly an ever-shrinking "god of the gaps." As an explanation, gods are becoming more and more irrelevant with the onward march of scientific progress and knowledge.
2007-11-13 08:52:40 · answer #1 · answered by R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In Truth, One Mind; Soul-individuation within God-Harmony brings true ideation:
Plato's under-standing of Good,
Plotinus' One Mind Soul;
Husserl's Pure Ego.
You might benefit by "Climb the Highest Mountain," Mark Prophet, "Watch Your Dreams," Ann Ree Colton, "The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?", Free and Wilcock, http://www.divinecosmos.com and "Light Is a Living Spirit" and "Man, Master of His Destiny," O. M. Aivanhov.
cordially,
j.
2007-11-13 16:43:05 · answer #2 · answered by j153e 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry bud but in order to understand it you have to really use your intelligence. Other wise you are working in blind faith and for all that is worth you will allow those of David Koresh, and Jim Jones to run your life to death.
YOU HAVE TO THINK, THAT'S WHAT GOD GAVE YOU A BRAIN FOR!! YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT WHAT HE IS SAYING AND HOW HE IS SAYING IT.
2007-11-13 16:27:36 · answer #3 · answered by the old dog 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
what the crap are you talking about?
Difine your meaning of "gross" and what does that have to do with an overall answer or prohibition?
Could you clerify the question please?
2007-11-13 18:28:35 · answer #4 · answered by lolainya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋