Tails serve several purposes, the most obvious of which is balance. Since balance is more difficult for bipeds than quadrupeds, it seems like a tail would be particularly useful for bipeds.
Though arms are pretty good for balance, humans like to use their arms for tasks like carrying babies, spears or other weapons, making it more difficult to use arms for balance. Is two million years too short a period to evolve tails?
2007-11-13
08:09:29
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Tom D
4
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology
OKIM - Ostriches can run at 40 mph. So did some some dinosaurs. In other words, not all bipeds move slowly. You claim there are no advantages to using a tail but offer no evidence - am I supposed to take your word for this?
Are you sure you should be trying to answer this question?
2007-11-13
08:28:59 ·
update #1
Dr. Y - Thanks - seems like a fairly thoughtful answer. However, I'm having difficulty 'connecting the dots' on your final paragraph.
It seems like you're saying that an upright posture is required in order to use arms and hands the way humans do. But couldn't there be some hypothetical animal that leans forward, has a heavy tail, and has grasping arms? Imagine a kangaroo with prehensile arms...
2007-11-13
08:49:45 ·
update #2