English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Seriously , please read this article and tell me if theres a better female canidate a women can choose from.
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/015993.php

I have lost all credibility in you if you feel she the best canidate to win the elction for the democrats.

PLEASE READ>

ANY republican would chew this lady out not because she a women but becuase she's a liar!

2007-11-13 08:05:16 · 6 answers · asked by 2008 matters 3 in Politics & Government Elections

6 answers

I don't need to read the article. I already know she's scum. Our country will be destroyed if the Hildabeast is elected!

2007-11-13 09:07:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You use an opinion blog as something credible and you wish to comment on other's credibility? Seriously, your faith in my credibility is my last concern. I've done research on all of the candidates, including the Republicans, and she's got my vote. It's starting to get amusing to see how many people make her out to be such a villain, just her and her alone, when ALL politicians do everything people like you love to accuse just her of doing. Politician have been planting questions in their audience since politics began. Bush did it, McCain's done it and if you think it's not a common practice you're crazy. But whatever Hillary does is amplified three fold, there has never been such a tight microscope on a Presidential candidate. All politicians work and waffle their answers. Name me one other politician - besides the holier than thou Saint Paul - and I'll find an example for each of them in short order.

Did you even watch the much discussed debate? It was a study in how to gang up on one candidate, and the questioner was the chief enabler, as 90% of the questions he asked ANYONE had the name Clinton in the question. It would have happened to whichever candidate happened to be the runaway front runner, that's all. She'll be ready on Thursday, have no doubt. And it wasn't a command to Wolf Blitzer, he will do as he pleases.

2007-11-13 09:17:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, I am a Moderate Republican, and I can honestly say nothing foul here. The over-zealous staffer did nothing unusual, nor inappropriate. ALL Candidates have a serious of structured scripts out there and a serious of structured questions. This is nothing new. For you maybe, but nothing new altogether. As for the Wolf Blitzer thing. I can see that as something annoying more than anything else. The last debate she was literally ganged up on. NOT because she is a woman, that is nothing more than victims crying out over a phantom issue. She was anged up on because she is the single most viable Democratic Candidate out there, which places a huge threat on them. If it were Obama, they would have ganged up on him and the victims of the world would be lamenting that it was because he was black. If it were Edwards, it would be the victims of the world lamenting because he is an Ambulance Chaser. All politicians are liars, of that there is not question; however, you cannot single one out as all of their crap stinks. What we really need is a statesman/stateswoman leading this country, and no more politicians.

2007-11-13 08:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by Kiker 5 · 1 0

You could NOT pay me to vote for the Hildabeast
NOT HILLARY 08

2007-11-13 11:04:09 · answer #4 · answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6 · 0 1

Ron Paul for Prez !

2007-11-13 08:44:20 · answer #5 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0 2

EDWARDS 2008!

2007-11-13 08:10:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers