English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've been researching on this topic and I've been trying to find out some "resolutions" made. But all I could find was that some of the provisions expired or were voted to expire.

2007-11-13 07:57:46 · 2 answers · asked by chloe 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2 answers

Secret Service jurisdiction was extended to investigate computer fraud, access device frauds, false identification documents or devices, or any fraudulent activities against U.S. financial institutions. The General Education Provisions Act was amended to allow the U.S. Attorney General or Assistant Attorney General to collect and retain educational records relevant to an authorized investigation or prosecution of an offence that is defined as a Federal crime of terrorism and which an educational agency or institution possesses. The Attorney General or Assistant Attorney General must "certify that there are specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe that the education records are likely to contain information [that a Federal crime of terrorism may be being committed]." An education institution that produces education records in response to such a request is given legal immunity from any liability that rises from such a production of records.

2007-11-13 08:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

i think that the Patriot Act is maximum options-blowing misnamed at wonderful. it really is the first step on a street to dropping the freedoms that we value so dearly contained in the united states. An social gathering, ok. The Patriot Act has been used to keep tabs on human beings promoting drugs contained in the united states it really is been used to arrest said drug sellers. this isn't the reason we were given for accepting this so talked about as Patriot Act. lately i heard the top of native land safe practices"?" saying in a speech that human beings that advance Marijuana were as undesirable as "terrorists" no longer purely that yet that said Marijuana growers ought to willingly help "terrorists" bent on killing human beings. This i refute maximum strongly!!! that is a line of crap. utilising the Patriot Act to bust human beings growing to be Marijuana is not basically unconstitutional notwithstanding that is inane. that is basically no longer real that Marijuana growers ought to willingly help "terrorists". Terrorists are literally not earning revenue off of promoting Marijuana. There would notwithstanding be some undesirable adult adult males promoting tremendous shipments of Heroin and or Cocaine to fund evil ventures (examine up on the CIA for that, also search for a way a lot opium changed into exported from afghanistan at the same time as the taliban managed it compared to before and after). after all i think that the Patriot Act is being misused even from their said objective. the actual shown reality that that is getting used to secret agent on and arrest human beings is information sufficient of that. particular you assert "yet in the journey that they are purely busting drug sellers, then why do i care?". basically ask your self if there is something that you do contained in the day that you would no longer favor to be eavesdropped on. because in the journey that they could interrupt out with utilising it to bust pot sellers, they could interrupt out with utilising it for something else.

2016-10-24 04:23:39 · answer #2 · answered by jepsen 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers