Do you think he is serious? Or he s just after liberal votes?
2007-11-13 07:56:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Absolutely.
I'm a libertarian.
He's really not a typical "Republican".
He'll bring all the troops home. He absolutely follows the constitution.
He even calls the war "Illegal" which it is because it was never declared by congress.
I've followed Ron Paul for over 20 years now.
He's not a fluff flip flopping politician. He's ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY for real.
Those who say different are following typical dirty politics that you can not trust somebody.
Ron Paul is by far the most rock solid voter in congress and has been for 10 terms.
If he says he is going to do it, he will.
Just look at his record! It's amazing.
His donations are exploding exponentially because of his honesty & integrity.
Far more than any other person on either platform.
Oh yea by the way he VOTED AGAINST IT!
Watch this video. The people who label him as "any other republican" do not know what they are talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFfdB5OzlyQ
For those who call Ron Paul a moron, guess what, he's the "moron" who has gotten more military contributions than any of the other GOP candidates COMBINED.
2007-11-13 08:06:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
Have you actually looked at this 10 TERM congressman's record? Do some research, and you'll see that he is the ONLY Anti-War candidate that can be trusted to CHANGE foreign policy.
He will not only bring the troops home from Iraq, but also from Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Europe, and over 100 other countries. This guy has the ideals to back his promises.
I just finished reading his book, A Foreign Policy of Freedom. And he has been forecasting this current fiasco for over 30 years now! Many votes have been cast 420 to 1, where the Good Doctor Paul is the only one on the opposite side!
2007-11-13 08:47:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
He was one of the only republicans to vote against the war from the very beginning. This guy has a consistant record for decades. Just go and check his voting record. He's also one of the only Congressmen who return his unused portion of his budget to the House and has voted against any benefits for the House members each time. As a doctor, he NEVER filed medicare or medicaid when his patients couldn't afford to pay him, so as not to burden the tax payers. This is all official records. The guy is a saint.
2007-11-13 14:47:59 · answer #3 · answered by TJTB 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's INSANE. He needs to get rid of FEMA even notwithstanding FEMA got here to assist Texas He needs to get rid of the dept of practise He needs to get rid of the IRS because he says earnings tax his uncostintuenle howver in Article a million section 8 it clearley says that the federal gov. can impose a nationwide revenues tax So till we've a nationwide revenues tax an earnings ta must be in position otherwise NO component to GOV ought to have an earnings intake.
2016-10-24 04:21:09 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he has a voting record of 20 years to back it up some times he was the only one voting against it but he still stood his ground
so yes you can believe him
2007-11-13 10:49:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He after VOTES. He's greatly laking in that area.
I don't trust him and his wacky proposals, and lack of information. I would never vote for him! Thank goodness he has a zero chance of getting the nomination!
2007-11-13 09:10:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He's for real...too bad some people can't handle the truth !
2007-11-13 08:46:22 · answer #7 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
he has the track record to prove it he voted against the Iraq war from the start. He also has never voted to raise taxes -he has never voted for unbalanced budget -etc he does what he says -his platform is
-end of big govt
-end of iraq war
-end of deficit
-end of unbalanced budgets
-end of devaluation of dollar
-end of policing the world
-end of exporting US jobs overseas
-end of income taxes
-end of no enforcement of illegal immigration
-end of corporate socialism
-end of no longer following the constitution
-end of unsecure borders and ports
and a foreign policy of peace-commerce & friendship
Top dem contenders have stated all troops will not come home until at least 2013 - and more than 59% want all troops home within a year (59 % of population is not liberal! ) so he isnt stealing any votes from anybody being he is the only viable candidate willing to pull all troops from Iraq
2007-11-13 08:03:39 · answer #8 · answered by rooster 5 · 8⤊ 8⤋
I think he's serious. Why not, the Democrat's front runner is Hillary, a Pro War Democrat.
2007-11-13 08:01:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
He is after the votes of radicals. He likes to stir things up. He does not stand a chance, so do not waste your votes on him. If you vote for him in the primaries, fine, but when he is not nominated, and if he runs independent, do not take the vote away from whoever the dems put forth.
Dems...RON PAUL IS FOR YOU!!! VOTE FOR HIM!!!
2007-11-13 08:01:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 14⤋