How about Edwards for President from 2008 to 2016 since he has more experience and then Obama as his Vice President during that time. Then once Edwards leaves office it can be Obama from 2016 to 2024!
VOTE DEMOCRAT in 08 and beyond!
2007-11-13 08:44:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by It's Your World, Change It 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not trust an Obama/Edwards ticket. Edwards/Obama would be more understandable since Edwards lacks the strength to do it alone, but Obama, if he wins the Dem primary, should choose someone outside the Beltway.
Both Edwards and Clinton are too familiar with the Beltway leading me to believe it would be business as usual.
Honestly, at this stage, I cant support Obama either, but I believe that would be his best chance.
2007-11-13 07:31:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by paradigm_thinker 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
MMM no, I am not agree, I think Hillary President, Mr. Obama Vice-President and perhaps Mr Edwards close to them, they are excellents, but Hillary is the best.
2007-11-17 07:21:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mr. Graham 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a repulican I can say that I would rather have Obama and Edwards than Hillary.
2007-11-13 07:36:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think you have it reversed. Edwards is moving up in the polls and I think he will take Iowa and the NH. Personally, I would like to Edwards pick someone like Joe Biden who could help with the mid-west red states.
Still, I will vote democratic next year, just because we have to do it.
2007-11-13 07:34:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Songbyrd JPA ✡ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow... Hillary is "Bush-like?"
I won't stand for this. This is OUTRAGEOUS!
President Bush should NEVER be insulted like this... I should report you.
Warm regards,
Douglas
Post Script: What... (if they have any at all, because I haven't heard any...) ideas do Senator Obama or Edwards have that you like?
I mean... any ideas that don't involve me surrendering more of my rights and/or money to the Government.
2007-11-13 07:30:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by prancinglion 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Either combination of those two will do. I'm not sure if Hillary is Bush-like, but I don't trust her either.
2007-11-13 07:41:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by crazy2all 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama and Edwards would be at each other's throat struggling for power. We're going to go with Clinton/Obama. First woman, first black. The nation's ready for it.
2007-11-17 07:20:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
fairly than Edwards it could fly. Edwards is a delicate-weight , can not carry sufficient votes to assist him. yet Clinton does have the credential for Sec. a minimum of she is commonly used with the gamers despite the fact that if she replaced into "only" First lady. So replaced into Elenore Roosevelt.
2016-10-16 09:38:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
At least you are right about Hillary. Not that she's Bush like, but you sure don't want her in office.
2007-11-13 07:33:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by booman17 7
·
0⤊
1⤋