I think every president should veto pork period.
2007-11-13 07:17:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
5⤊
5⤋
Only if he can go back in time to veto all pork barrel spending from the republicans from when his term began.
2007-11-13 15:22:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
When he refused to veto any of the pork barrel spending from Republicans for the first six years?
Sounds like wing-nut logic to me!
"Wasteful spending is bad ONLY when it's done by Democrats; everything (including mass murder, treason, torture, and rape) are good, when done by Republicans."
2007-11-13 20:32:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Pork is Pork, he never vetoed a thing when it was his boys spending like drunken sailors, so now he's going to talk about spending? Son you do need a reality check.
2007-11-13 15:28:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It is good he vetos now and then. He didn't for many years so as to try and get along with the democrats.
The problem was, the demos weren't cooperating and being reciprical abot it. They just hated Bush....like me.
2007-11-13 15:20:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's easy to use that as an excuse to veto...however....don't tell me your going to sit there and say that none of the bills he signed while Republicans controlled congress had pork ?..are you ?..
fact: not a single veto while Republicans held congress.
fact: not a single signature while Democrats hold office.
You see a pattern here ?
To answer more directly.... yes he should veto pork....too bad he never vetoed "pork" until recently...
2007-11-13 15:15:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
5⤋
NOPE, because that is the only way money gets spent on the people who are paying the taxes, instead of every other country.
2007-11-13 15:20:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
HE SHOULD DO THIS. THE DEMOCRATS JUST WANT TO TAX & SPEND.
2007-11-14 13:17:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
SHOULD YES
WILL NO!
Sorry about that but that's politics.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-11-13 16:51:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sure why not, He might as well make the rest of government as ineffective as he is!
2007-11-13 15:19:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋