When a building is brought down by a team of demolitionist, you see puffs of smoke, and hear bangs from charges going off before the building implodes. They are also so precise that they bring buildings straight down. WTC had no puffs of smoke, or bangs, and fell sideways. Anyone in the business will tell you this. So is Rosie just nuts?
2007-11-13 06:26:48 · 15 answers · asked by mbush40 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe not sideways so much, but it did lean before it fell.
2007-11-13 06:34:34 · update #1
Certifiably.
2007-11-13 06:30:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Although it is obvious that the White House knew enough abotu 9/11 beforehand that they could have stopped it, I don't subscribe to the notion that the WTC was brought down by internal explosives.
There are reasons to be suspicious. There are things that do not seem to make sense, but they all have reasonable explainations. That does not mean, however, that anyone who thinks otherwise is a nutjob and far, as anti-American Republicons like to say. There is no hard proof either way. I go with what I believe is the preponderance of the evidence, but in the absence of hard-core proof, reasonable people can differ.
I wonder though about right wing nuts who just try to dismiss and discourage desenting opinions, investigations, and a rational discussion of the issues by saying something like "she is fat and crazy". Even if she were fat, even if she were crazy, it would not mean that she is wrong. Politically motivated insults and smears do not a rational argument make. When someone presents an opinion, and facts that one thinks prove their case, and the only thing that an opponent can say is "you are fat and crazy", my belief is that the opponent is agreeing with you. If someone has no rebutal - no evidence or argument to refute what you say, then you have won the debate. Republicans like to think that lies and smears are more important than logicn and evidence. They are wrong and evidently they know it.
2007-11-14 02:34:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Check out the link about the Empire state building.
It was hit by a B-25 Bomber and it still stands.
9/11 is a tragic incident in US history, but you got to wonder, the way the building fell like a domino similar to a controlled demolition. My reaction was when the plane hits the building, it will severe the top part of it but the bottom would be intact.
It might be true that there might be an inside job in 9/11 or might not, but one way to find out is to dig deeper into the 9/11 investigations which for some reasons this administration continues to block it.
EDIT : Apologies for the misquotes.
Counsel of Rome: By the way, learn to read the article as well, and think of it is similar to 9/11
Plane --> Rammed --> no domino effect ?
2007-11-13 06:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by BrushPicks 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
WTC did have puffs of smoke coming from the bottom and there were bangs. Video footage taken at the scene shows firefighters commenting on hearing the sounds of explosives going off. At the time of the collapse, television news reporter (Peter Jennings?) commented that building fell perfectly like it was a set demolition.
2007-11-13 06:43:40 · answer #4 · answered by MadLibs 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Her and the whole left.
for the guy above, learn to read, okay
the Empire State Building. Many do not know of the tragic incident of July 28, 1945 -- the day a B-25 bomber, lost in fog, rammed into what was then the world's tallest building. Fewer, still, remember the miraculous survival of the woman who fell 75 stories when the cables to her elevator were severed.
2007-11-13 06:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
hmm
I don't really listen to Rosie on anything, because her voice and attitude annoys me, but it is obvious that you didn't watch the same building fall that everyone else did, if you think the WTC fell sideways.
It didn't lean and fall either! it swayed from the impact and collapsed straight to the ground.
Am I a conspiracy theorist in this situation? NO, but I do think without them, the government would be able to pull off many things that you and I would never see.
Conspiracy theorists are the people's second check on our government next to voting.
2007-11-13 06:32:01 · answer #6 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 12⤊ 2⤋
No building has ever fallen sideways. There were puffs of smoke however at WTC, but this was due to built up pressure from collapsing floors. It also explains the "explosions". Rosie and her ilk are loons
2007-11-13 06:32:04 · answer #7 · answered by NEO PIRATE 3 · 7⤊ 4⤋
I watched it that morning, and there was a huge wall of smoke, firefighters were recorded on live TV saying they heard explosions going off, then the building started coming down.
To believe that 19 highjackers got lucky that morning is to live in Denial.
And ask yourself why did Silverstine say "I ordered Building #7 pulled"?
2007-11-13 06:34:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
The WTC was designed to handle strong winds, not jet planes at full speed!
I saw the whole PBS special documentary which interviewed the original architect. He backs up this fact.
Yes. She is delusional.
Have you ever seen her behind the scenes videos on her website?
Scary.
Next question.
2007-11-13 06:33:30 · answer #9 · answered by Neal 4 · 4⤊ 6⤋
I don't understand anyones obsession with Rosie. She is just another citizen with an opinion. Whether you agree or don't is up to the individual.
2007-11-13 06:36:16 · answer #10 · answered by gone 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋