Fred Thompson. But Mitt Romney is looking mighty attractive as well. I think Sam Brownback would be a solid VP.
2007-11-13 05:20:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by mustagme 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Obama will win the election. despite the fact that it is accessible that the Republicans will scouse borrow it for McCain if the votes are close sufficient, only like they did in 2000 and 2004. the different danger is that the Republicans will pull some stunt (like yet another 9/11 attack) and use it as an excuse to declare martial regulation and placed off or cancel the election. This additionally ought to take place presently after the election if Obama is asserted the winner.
2016-10-16 09:18:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, by asking this question on Yahoo you are going to hear a lot of "Hillary will win" type response, due to the fact you have many woman (mostly who do not even vote) on here that worship her name. This election is unique because it offers the women across the US not to make a pollitically correct decision, but rather a psychological decision based upon a same sex option. Hillary is going to obtain many "free" votes simply because of her sex, without needing to actually prove anything.
Because she is effectively biased in this sense, I will not consider her part of the election in my mind.
I think (know?) the average American would live a better life with an outcome of Ron Paul. He is a person who would take and rid some of the new age tactics from our governments nasty 21st century tendencies, a man our forefathers would be proud of in this day in age. Is he likely to win? I don't feel odds are currently with him. Should you want him to win? That depends on whether or not you enjoy all of your rights or would rather lose more of them.
It's really tough for me to honestly say, I can only tell you who I would like to win, as will others.
2007-11-13 05:44:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by M M 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Honestly. Its hard to say. AMERICA IS STUPID and I mean STUPID with name recognition. Which is how we got Hillay and Guiliani.
My personal opiion is everyone wants the war to be stopped, but were quick to elect Bush to a 2nd term. Everyone wanted Clinton (Bill) to be punished for fooling the American people when he "didnt have sexual relations" yea right, but now they wont him back, Everyone wants t heard as one, not just rich verses wealthy..
I choose Honesty, Integrity, A voice for the American People.
OBAMA 08
Myth --
1) During the pledge of Allegance, do you put your hand over your heart ..not the national anthem (which is what he did_
2) He and Hillary are the same -- no, they are not. He can handle tough questions and give you a answer wether youagree or not. Ask Detroit and there automakers or Ask Hillary and the girl she paid to ask her easy questions.
3) He WILL BE THE ONLY PASSIONATE ENOUGH to get us out of IRAQ in 16 months after elected. Not 2013.. Try 2010ish 2011. I know, but it takes time to do something right.
4) His current position on the War is the same as it was before it started. NO to Foolish WARS.
So yeah, It should be OBAMA vs GULIANI to take the white house. OBAMA 08
2007-11-13 05:20:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by 2008 matters 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mitt Romney
2007-11-13 05:16:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by J 1 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
For the sake of this nation, hopefully not Hillary Clinton.
I'm sorry I cannot answer your question with any actual data.
2007-11-13 05:16:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither of the current candidates....Jeb is lurking in the
shadows...he is likely to pounce on the WhiteHouse!
2007-11-13 05:49:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think we could see a surprise draft for Al Gore. .
2007-11-13 07:51:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Grandma 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
voting for Ron Paul.
2007-11-13 05:21:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
hillary, unless ron paul goes anti war
2007-11-13 05:18:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by smarternow 4
·
0⤊
1⤋