English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I thought Hillary was for the middle class?

2007-11-13 04:39:58 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

I DONT SUPPORT THE WAR! MY GOD.

2007-11-13 05:31:43 · update #1

17 answers

America can't afford Sen. Clinton.

For that matter, there aren't any current presidential candidates that we can afford.

We're damned whichever way we go until we stop with the left-versus-right ideology and get down to the fact that we ALL need to make sacrifices, we ALL need to work together and we ALL have to support our country (its Constitution, the freedoms we enjoy and our liberties) or we can kiss everything good-bye.

2007-11-13 06:29:13 · answer #1 · answered by docscholl 6 · 0 1

Take the average bill for a family of three on Private health insurance.

In Network, so I have very little choice on who I see.
$250 per month for three people via a employment health care plan.
$2500 Deductible.
$35 Office Visit.
20% Cinsurance.

This isn't included $75 per medication.


Compare this to the European system.

Payment depends on how much I earn . The more I earn the more I pay, this also covers pensions, unemployment, etc Currently the NHS only part is around £75 per month.

I get free doctors.
I choose who I what to see, if I disagree with the doctor I see another one free.
Very little waiting list, if I have to wait over 6 weeks I can choose to have my treatment anywhere in Europe.
Prescriptions are £6.50 per prescription.

Overall people pay less in socialized society, and according to WHO get better treatment. Canada pays less than the USA already.


TyranusX - I'm guessing you would ban all health care since you disagree with people being healthy.

2007-11-13 12:58:29 · answer #2 · answered by clint_slicker 6 · 0 0

Hilary is just a joke. I'm independent and she is not the way to go. Socialization sounds good at first but it has done wonders for Russia.

The problem with health care is that the government is involved. So the solution is to make them completely in charge??? where is the logic in that.

What makes people think government run health care would be good. Please show me something government does better than the private sector; something that demonstrates their competence and qualifications...please anything.

I am against the war too. Quit being party sheep. just because your against the stupid health care plan doesn't mean you have to be for the stupid war. They are not related. Face the facts both parties are not representing you; they represent themselves and their agendas.

2007-11-13 12:46:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You are spot on on this one.

Seen an article today that 1.6 trillion has been spent and its going to cost a family of 4 20,000 $ a year and possibly go to 45,000 $ to pay this back.

Economists say we're heading straight into a recession.
I don't like the way things look for the next president having all this garbage dumped on him/her.

Hillary is a pinko commie neocon in disguise.
These dems voted for this war in iraq because they knew they could tax us later for it.

2007-11-13 12:49:12 · answer #4 · answered by WhereTheBuffaloRoam 5 · 0 1

I would rather pay for health and education than a war any day, but I dont like hillary.

2007-11-13 12:42:21 · answer #5 · answered by bloodshotcyclops 4 · 2 0

Can we afford a trillion dollar war on terror? Im sure the Retardlicans will blame Democrats for the recession in the next couple of years.

2007-11-13 12:44:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

If we can afford to spend a trillion $ in Iraq, most of which can't be accounted for, And build the Biggest embassy in the world in Baghdad totalling almost $600 million, I suppose we could find a way to take care of our own in this country. Dont you think?

2007-11-13 12:42:53 · answer #7 · answered by Myles D 6 · 2 1

No.

Hillary had a chance to create a perfect American society when her husband, Bill Clinton, was president. Bill also had an official political advisor, Monica Lewinsky, to help the Clintons too.

If Hillary couldn't do it then, she can't do it now.

2007-11-13 12:43:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

what economic decline? stop reading the ny times and start reading the wall street journal...and we cannot afford to let hillary run the corner candy store, never mind a country. she has never done either.

2007-11-13 12:44:34 · answer #9 · answered by darwinman 5 · 1 2

Some people dont understand that by putting money in peoples pockets it helps the economy

2007-11-13 12:42:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers