Why is the mainstream media pushing HillaryClintoon on all of us? Why even have an election?

Question

Rupert Murdoch holds fundraisers for her and CNN has been caught censoring all alternative candidates pushing the globalist elitist's choice on us.

alph: Don't be ridiculous. It actually IS a "conspiracy" to keep the Boosh/Clintoon Dynasty going.
If you think that there is a difference between the two after all this time,
I'm sorry, but you haven't been doing your research.

Brickity, I agree with you 100%, there is in fact hardly any difference at all between Roody and Clintoon, they might as well be running on the same ticket,
Actually, that wouldn't surprise me,

let's have the corruption and thug gangster tradition of NY with 9-11 and all right in the white house,
soon it will be apparent to all what has happened to this country,
full on military police state Fascism.

Mele Kai: Exactly. This is why I'm for Paul,
Hitlery will certainly censor the internet, she is a globalist bilderberger fascist hellery on wheels.
This country is in dire straits.

Answer 1

She is the annointed candidate,so they will give her all the press she wants,and ignore the rest whenever possible. Not sure why they picked her,between the negatives she already has,like the fact that 40% of the electorate says they would Never vote for her under any circumstances.Or that she has one fund-raising scandal after another,most seemingly connected to the Chinese in one way or another. Personally I hope she gets the nomination,because I don't think she can get elected,and because even some Dems are coming out now saying she could hurt their chance at reelection.

"Hillary-The Real Manchurian Candidate"

AD

Answer 2

i imagine of it really is an challenge of interpretation. some human beings say the glaring shown reality that the media makes a speciality of a few applicants and not in any respect others shows that they try to push their own agenda. Others argue that the media specializes interior the applicants who've already garnered help. i visit allow you comprehend that if I ran a newspaper i doesn't waste somewhat some section on Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul both. it really is annoying to imagine of what conspiracy would contain multiple articles about Giuliani, Clinton, Romney, Obama, Thompson and Edwards. How ought to favor to they be pushing all of them?

Answer 3

Clintoon? There you go again with the childish name calling. When is the far right going to learn that they need to talk issues not resort to name calling?

Perhaps the media wants to sell advertising. That is how they make money. People don't want to turn on the news and hear about some candidate with little or no chance of winning. People want to hear about what a winner is doing. The fact that she is a female candidate also makes her newsworthy. It is funny without elections more than the media has pesumed her to be next in line to the big chair but there may be enough Democrats who don't vote for her in the primaries that all the fuss and bother about her will be wasted. I hope that happens. I will laugh at the amout of energy and hate that has been wasted on her.

Answer 4

Media matters which has been feeding stories to the mass media was founded by Hillary Clinton and caught on camera bragging about it and other media plants also the whole planted questions just go to show you it is all a show. Hollywood is most pleased. I am glad people realize that the Clinton machine started under the first Clinton is working for the second.

Answer 5

Because you don't dare even say a cross word about Hillary or you wind up with no access to her.

I like to know how come she gets a big old pass saying she didn't know about the fake questions.

or how she didn't know her husband was cheating on her.

Until Clinton apologizes for her "vast right-wing consparcy" line she has no creditablity with me.

If a conservative did 1/10 what Hillary has gotten away with so far the media would have that person run out on rail.

I do believe liberals have one set of standards for themselves and another they want everyone else to live by.

Answer 6

The liberals enjoy sympathy from the MSM.

The MSM is no longer a source of information but rather a willing participant in the process.

They are campaigning too.
The are pretty stupid though. They don't avoid Hillary's negatives but the spend a lot of time excusing them and comparing them to worse negatives on the right.
I think that will back-fire though. If you give enough people enough time to dwell on a negative they will be repulsed by it.

Answer 7

300 million in campaign piggy bank... federal lobbyist money, US weapons support... mega media world wide man Murdoch, not your average constituent now is he? Media Matters that is certain...

When you control and manipulate it you can alter it. Pork barrel spending as a Senator, we have paybacks now too. Special interests... you and I are pawns, UNLESS you do the research.

Clinton campaign counts on new voters who have no idea as to the reality of her experience and the concept of change is muted. Wait & watch as she is spearheading the Talk Radio monitoring & limitations of Internet usage & information. Sqwashing our freedoms of speech for good. Actually for her good. Thanks!

Answer 8

the mainstream media is extremely liberal in its bias..they use Bush to push socialism on us when Bush isnt even running this itme..hes not even a valid issue....hilldemon is very probably the anti-Christ and the sheepeople are just too dumbded down to notice it...take note of the first answer.."what,and keep Bush?"...hes not even in this election....jeeeeze

Answer 9

They've bought the "inevitability" pitch made by her campaign. Plus, of course, they think she's the bees knees.

Answer 10

It's an election strategy. They keep mentioning her name. Knowing that so many people dislike her, maybe the Republican's WANT to run against her b/c they think they will win.