If Hillary is the best choice the Democrats can come up with what does that say about the morals of the democratic party?
2007-11-13 02:41:08 · 18 answers · asked by MY NAME MICHELLE I HATE AMERICA 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Or more importantly, why does she have Bill campaigning for and with her!
2007-11-13 02:43:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 7⤋
And the Republican Party has better candidates? OH PLEASE!!!!
I agree Hillary is not a good choice, and she will lose now that she is stooping as low as the gender vote.. I am tired of hearing "The BOYS ganged up on her" yes they ganged up but it was for her political views NOT her gender.. Anyone who watched that debate saw that but ofcourse she is saying they attacked her because she is a woman. She's a disgrace, and anyone who is playing that card along with her is not worthy of voting because they are blinded by gender and not voting for her because of her political views or her abilty to run a country which is falling apart. I want someone who can fix the problems not someone who when the going gets tough falls back on being a woman and everyone is picking on me stand.
And who ever said Hillary was qualified? What has she done?? She was 1st lady who did nothing, and then came to MY home state and became a senator who did nothing but campaign for president. Does that make her QUALIFIED? come on!
Morals of the dem party? What about the morals of the Republican party .. RUDY? need i say more? The guys an idiot and he's the front runner??
2007-11-13 02:58:01 · answer #2 · answered by Ditka 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
no one stated she ran the White homestead. yet for the duration of bill's first term she replaced into bill's own ambassador to over 70 countries, representing u.s. and development relationships with worldwide leaders. She replaced into additionally in contact with many national communities and projects in this time. And in case you want information that she ought to have had involvement - inspect what got here approximately whilst they tried for commonplace healthcare some years in the past. She replaced into on the forefront of that (in spite of the undeniable fact that it replaced into unsuccessful) and bill isn't any fool. If Hillary replaced into in elementary terms some random housewife such as you needless to say believe - bill does no longer have enable Hillary be forefront of this. It replaced into because of the fact she had shown herself by using being lively in his in the previous decision making. they're a team and handbook one yet another. It ought to make you offended that regardless of the affairs and the dirt slinging from the Republicans they stilll artwork jointly and help one yet another.
2016-10-16 08:58:38 · answer #3 · answered by thorton 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Guiliani were qualified to be President on his own merits, why didn't he run before Bill?
If Mitt Romney were qualified to be President on his own merits, why didn't he run before Bill?
Why is it that Republican propaganda is sounding more and more deperate to find something negative about anyone patriotic enough not to support their anti-American agenda?
2007-11-13 04:49:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is stupid.
She will have 8 years as a US Senator under her belt plus 8 years of political activity as First Lady which she didn't have before Bill was President.
You might as well ask "If Rudy Giuliani is qualified to be President, why didn't he run for president before he ran for Mayor of NYC?"
2007-11-13 02:49:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I don't think a Conservative has much wiggle room in pointing to others morals. As far as her running now. Well it's all in the timing.
2007-11-13 03:10:26 · answer #6 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I laugh at Mayor Quimby's answer
Just because everyone running on the opposite side ( GOP) is keeping their distance from the joke of a President we now have.
All we can say is Thanks George for destoying what was left of the GOP
2007-11-13 02:49:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Morals and Politics are an oxymoron. And Hillary can run, whenever she wants, good for her.
2007-11-13 02:54:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
She was NOT a politician back then. So why would she have ran?
And as far as Bill campaigning with her.. how many wives are out campaigning for their husbands? all of them. Yet you don't complain about them?
If you had an ace in the hole like Bill and were trying to win.. you'd let him campaign for you as well.
2007-11-13 02:45:59 · answer #9 · answered by pip 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Would anyone vote for Hillary if Bill Clinton did not exist? Not a chance.
2007-11-13 02:47:29 · answer #10 · answered by thor_torkenson 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Hillary, Hillary ALL THE WAY!!!!
2007-11-13 02:54:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋