English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

The controversial 1857 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Dred Scott made slavery legal in all the territories. Dred Scott was a black slave who belonged to an officer in the United States Army. His master had taken him from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then to Wisconsin Territory, which had been declared a free territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820.When his master was ordered back to Missouri by the Army, Scott went with him. After his master died, however, Scott sued, claiming that he was no longer a slave because he had lived on free soil. The case was carried to the United States Supreme Court. On March 6, 1857, a majority of the court (seven out of nine), through the opinion of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that Scott was still a slave and not a citizen and so had no constitutional right to sue in a federal court. The decision further held that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories and that the Missouri Compromise therefore was unconstitutional.President James Buchanan urged all the people to accept the decision as final, but antislavery leaders in the North continued their agitation against slavery. By convincing many Northerners that Southern slaveholders were determined to rule the nation, the Dred Scott decision served to widen the gap between the North and the South and helped bring on the American Civil War.

2007-11-13 02:14:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Dred Scott was not free even though he entered a free state
Dred Scott could not ask the Supreme Court for help for he was not officially a citizen of the US
Congress had no right to exclude slavery from any territory

2007-11-13 10:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers