English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That is what they are saying in my neighborhood. And I
live in the Southeastern US.... Republicans are angry at
Bush for betraying them, and his legacy will go down in
the history books, as the worst administration ever. Major
job loss, social security turmoil, real estate tragedy, high
crime, increased gang activity, deterioration of public
services funds, no border protection after 9/11, spying
on Americans, low consumer confidence, and much more.
Unless you have been living under a rock, then you would
notice these things all across the board. Where is Ron
Paul, when you need him. And by the way, I am a
Democrat.... So much negative energy coming from this.
Is Bush the worst president ever ? Oh don't forget the gas
prices. Best answer wins. *

2007-11-13 01:56:04 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Herbert Hoover was faaaaarrrrr worse
than Jimmy "Jam" Carter. Another
Republican. C'mon man, the 70's
were not that bad economically.
That is when most cities were
starting to boom, in spite of the oil
crisis. Things were much more
thorough then. Ahh, the 1970's.

2007-11-13 02:08:04 · update #1

UH, Robert S. That unemployment
figure is because the ICE, and the
Coast Guard has been bought off.
The PERM Coalition is in favor of
"illegal" Mexican immigrants, deliberately taking jobs from Americans. So they do not count
us in those figures. Therefore, it
is them who have filled up that void.
or your so called 4.7 %. That is
a fact.

2007-11-13 02:28:18 · update #2

38 answers

He is definitely the worst president in my lifetime, perhaps in all of history.

2007-11-13 02:01:56 · answer #1 · answered by Pam H 6 · 6 7

Each and every one of your points has a clear positive note to it. Or at the vary least, has change little sinse the Reagan administration. C'mon, job loss ? Lowest and most continuous unemployment trend (currently 4.7%) since 1982 where it approached 10%. Hardly major.

You have fallen into the thick media fog. Don't be a mere sheep, follow along blindly, and contribute to the misrepresentation. You have a personal responsibility to look into this yourself and clear away the mist and shed light on the actual truth of things. If you think the media is not biased against everything Bush, your mistaken.

2007-11-13 02:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by Robert S 6 · 0 0

Jimmy Carter should have stayed on his peanut farm. He was such a horrible president, which if I were him I would have chosen another legacy after my term also. He is a "A" humanitarian and an "F" as president. Bush however only fairs slightly better and I voted for him. He is far from amny Republican values, more liberal than 45% of democrates and like his father did not deliver on many of his prelection promises. I am so tired of Presidents, party not with standing who sit on the wrong side of the isle.... We need a new election process..no more Rep... Dem or some small 3rd party.. Just liberal, conservative and moderate parties.

2007-11-13 02:20:05 · answer #3 · answered by cowboydressednblack 1 · 1 1

For those Americans saying Clinton was the worst ever, you have a funny sense of priorities. Lets see, when Clinton left was impeached for having extra-marital sex he left the American economy at an all time high, Very little unemployment, International relations at an all time high, achieved much for peace with the middle east and China and he is the worst? Bush on the other hand has taken that economy and driven it through the floor. the dollar is at an all time low, the American is one of the most hated nations on the planet, has begun a new arms race, wasted billions of dollars on new military projects, ignored information that would have prevented 9/11 (that isn't a conspiracy theory it is a FACT confirmed by the head of the CIA) unemployment is very high (don't know where you get your info neo pirate, CNN maybe?), has started 2 wars, taken your freedoms with bogus laws about combatting terrorism, spied on all of you and stuck 2 fingers up to the courts when told that is illegal, Fired any high court judges who disagree with him, accused anyone who doesn't follow him as being unpatriotic and supporting terrorism and somehow all this is more acceptable to you than someone having sex so he gets to keep his position. What a country!

2007-11-13 02:16:53 · answer #4 · answered by DANIEL C 2 · 3 3

As far as a puppet to the World Board...Bush & his Buds were perfect...they did exactly as they were told, no questions. They sacrificed their personal integrities, our country's integrities, the welfares of We the People, for very cushy after-office lives...they will want for nothing. If you don't think so, then why would a Prez. & Admin. still be in office while border-lining on treason of US ideals & freedoms with not even an assassination attempt, while the media went wild on those caught eavesdropping, & getting a smile put on their face, trying to get them impeached...And those that were actually creating changes for our good, were killed??? Non-sense!!!

We need to drop the affiliation garbage...Dems/Reps--it's BS of the highest regard. We need to protect & support those of wisdom & grander vision of this country & it's purpose for being what it was meant to be...We the People need to do this, not just SS or military. We the People need to get our individual acts in gear--our physical health is atrocious!!! Our knowledge is great, but our wisdom...where is it??? We keep allowing & doing the same things over & over again...this is stupidity, not ignorance.

With all the connect that we have available to us at this point in time, We the People need to take a stronger hand in what occurs in the running of our country business--'America, Inc.' Until we rally to do so, we will remain the puppets of the puppets...and We will remain responsible for all of it, nonetheless.

Sooo...I highly suggest, Dear Fellow Americans...get off your buns & move the bods...get back your strength of well-being. And knowing that there are only 2 types of humans--those with brains, & those with brains that use them--pick a side!!! Rock this coming election year with wisdom of mind, strength of spirit, and bodies that can hold up to the tasks before us!!! Make this the grandest New Year's Resolution you ever dreamed!!! See us for Who & What We the People can create of ourselves--a Light of the World...proof positive that this conglomeration of every thing of this Earth CAN work & play together with positive & prosperous results...that "if all do well, all do well". Your choice...take it or leave it!!!

2007-11-13 03:05:51 · answer #5 · answered by MsET 5 · 1 1

He has Diverted Funds badly needed in America towards War Mongering in Iraq and Elsewhere. He is in Cahoots with Big Business like the Oil Companies . That is the main reason for Invading Iraq. He is now Threatening the Russians by trying to Site I,C,B,Missiles in Poland and they think it is a Blatant Attempt at them thus provoking a possible Nuclear War, or a return to the Cold War. We in Europe want America to take its Missiles and Army out of Europe and back to America. We do not want Illegally Held Prisoners by America Flown through our Countries to Secret Prisons in Europe or Elsewhere in the East.We would like to see Guatanamo Bay Prison closed down and the Site given back to the Cubans. The Prisoners should be either Charged and sent to Trial or set free.

2007-11-13 02:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by janus 6 · 2 1

While George W. Bush is obviously going down as America's worst President by a long ways. Ron Paul is not the answer. If you think things are bad now under Ron Paul there would be anarchy. The infrastructure would be horrible. America would, for sure, be a third world country. His pie-in-the-sky ideas aren't practical. I know I won't get your 10 points and don't care. I don't happen to agree on Ron Paul but do agree on the rest of it.

2007-11-13 02:27:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Yes, I would evaluate the performance as poor

i would also think there are some mistakes that previous administrations made that have a trickling down effect and we're paying for now.

too bad there is no way to remove him through the office and we'll probably have to suffer through to package him out

Ron Paul .. not sure .. still evaluating him myself

2007-11-13 02:20:31 · answer #8 · answered by Mildred S 6 · 0 0

i don't think that it matters anymore, as long as he is history before he decides to attack iran.
if he attacks then i believe that he will become infamous as the man that started world war three.
the russians will not have any attacks on iran, they are massive trading partners, the chinese will not put up with any attacks on iran and israel cannot live without having them attacked. North korea will sieze the moment and let loose and pakistan will make its true choice of friend, making india having to consider pre-emptive strikes. the weakest countries will be over-run by the stronger and i believe that america and europe will finally have bitten off more than they can chew. the result is anybodys guess, i know nothing about strategy but for sure we on teetering on the edge of some very cagey times
another president can curtail all this but bush will steam in with his belief that america can handle anything and unleash worlwide devastation before anyone can stop him.

2007-11-13 03:38:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hi as a Brit i know very little of what goes on in the USA, how ever it seems from the news he has done a lot of damage over Iraq and is seen here as a war monger be that right or wrong. For myself I get very annoyed when our Prime Minister seems to be doing all possible to get up the **** of the American President.Don't get this wrong i am very pro America but am Brit first.

2007-11-13 02:06:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Your information from your neighbors is questionable to say the least. Jobs have increased, social security has been a mess since the 1970's, the real estate crisis as you call it is because of the foreclosure of sub prime loans, which Bush has nothing to do with, I agree that the border issue has been skirted, as it has been for 20 years, spying on Americans? Hardly, part of the Homeland Security program. Do some research and you will find that it is not nearly as invasive to Americans as previous non selective programs were. Consumer confidence low? The stock markets are at all-time highs.
Anyone foolish enough to say he is the worst President ever, has no working knowledge of American history, here are 8 off the top of my head that are much worse, Buchanon, Pierce, Carter, Grant, A. Johnson, Fillmore, Clinton, Harding.....there are many more. Years from now, you may be able to look back and realize how wrong you all were about Bush.

2007-11-13 02:05:08 · answer #11 · answered by booman17 7 · 4 7

fedest.com, questions and answers