English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-13 00:12:50 · 17 answers · asked by somber 3 in Politics & Government Politics

Admit it you guys got off on watching shock and awe in Iraq, oblivious to the thousands of innocent Iraqis being killed..the Republican pathology is one of sickness,death, and misery.

2007-11-13 00:14:34 · update #1

17 answers

Aside from the majority being flaming misogynists that giggle with glee at the thought of women being demoralized and dehumanized via religious doctrine and government sanction, they have to breed more soldiers to sacrifice in their endless wars for fun and profit.

Make no mistake, there is a method to their madness.

Hitler and Stalin would be so proud of them.

2007-11-13 00:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 1 3

You ask so I will give you the answer. You won't like it but I'll give it to you anyway.

You are using an apples to oranges comparision. And because you didn't stipulate, I'm going to assume by pro-life you mean anti abortion. This may be incorrect.

First, an unborn child has NO choice who the dam and sire are yet it still deserves a chance to become a person of value in society. Many people have risen above the conditions that faced them growing up. They made a choice. They could have stayed as they were but they didn't. They said I was born here but I don't have to stay here. I can change. I can do better. I can overcome my situation and be more than I am now.

Second, no people who are pro-life want war. But they recognise there are times when in order to cook eggs you have to crack some shells. And in war there will be non combatant people who die. To limit action to something that will not cause fatalities is impossible.

Would you be be speaking Japanese or German today if we had limited ourselves to never causing death during WWII? How would the German and Japanese armies and navies been stopped from taking control of the world?

To show you the flaw in your question and how obvious it is. Why do pro choice people care if a few innocents die in war? They have been responsible for over 50 MILLION deaths of unborn children. These unborn children have done absolutely nothing to warrant their extermination in mass. They have hurt no one. They have commited no crime. They are generally killed as a matter of convinence. Pro choice people have been responsible for more premature deaths than Hitler, Stalin, and Pot Pol combined.

2007-11-13 09:19:12 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 1

The liking for war has nothing to do with political persuasion.

The liking for war has a great deal to do with being human, particularly being male, and human, or ape. It seems to be associated with being mammal, and the more intelligent you are as a mammal, the greater the liking of war.

Why is wrestling so popular? Why are prize fighters hero's? Why did the Romans fete the Gladiators? Why do men, even in our evolved times, resort to fist fighting?

It's all about dominance, and it is an instinctive behavior.

Now if you want to see a group which really dislikes war, and violence of any kind, look at the women, the wives and mothers, instinctively, they want to preserve the lives of their men.
Perhaps this is why abortion is such an abomination, because it represents a perversion of the instinctive behavior of the mother to protect her child.

2007-11-13 08:38:10 · answer #3 · answered by maryjellerson 4 · 0 0

No one is pro war. In case you forgot, America was attacked 6 years ago by an unprovoked enemy. Was Iraq part of the problem? That's for history to decide. For too many years, America sat idly by while its citizens were kidnapped, held hostage and murdered - Iran, Beirut, Somalia, the U.S.S. Cole, etc.
This country's primary responsibility is protect the life of its citizens and sometimes it is necessary to attack those who threaten that life.

2007-11-13 09:54:33 · answer #4 · answered by mikey 6 · 0 1

A lot more people have been killed in military conflicts under Democrats than Republicans, by far.www.mapsofwar.com/ind/american-wars.html

2007-11-13 09:13:55 · answer #5 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 0 0

This is a false premise. There are many pro-lifers on both sides of the war debate.

Understanding the US separation of powers and the way the decision to go to war works in this nation, and then supporting our nation is not "pro-war."

2007-11-13 08:25:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 4 2

I'm pro life and pro war because I'd rather kill our enemies than our babies. You libs should be against abortion too, it kills a lot more future Democrats than anyone else.

2007-11-13 09:50:51 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 1

i don't see the connection between killing an unborn child and going to war against murdering terrorist that kill innocent people and attack innocent people that they are not even at war with

2007-11-13 08:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by dave g 2 · 0 0

Pretty much the same reason the Pro-Life crowd tends to be in favor of the death penalty (And yes I know that there are exceptions, myself amongst them).

It is my increasing belief that politically in America more and more people are forming political opinions based on knee jerk reactions against the opposite side and less and less because they review and really think about each individual matter.

2007-11-13 08:18:28 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 4 3

Roe V Wade > 50 MILLION U.S. LIVES LOST

Iraq < 5 THOUSAND U.S. LIVES LOST

Get your priorities straight sonny. If you really cared about human life you would stop the senseless slaughter in your back yard from happeneing first don't you think?

2007-11-13 08:26:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers