Nature had it that man should be for woman and vice-versa. Taking this thesis as God's plan, does not the idea of same sex marriage a manifestation of total perversion that resulted from deliberate alteration of what was originally planned for humankind?
2007-11-12 18:56:54 · 25 answers · asked by Lenlen 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You know, man was supposed to see as well. Does blindness mean a perversion, then?
And do you honestly think that people who love each other are responsible for the distortion in the world (tsunamis, global warming, hunger, wildfires ... ) simply because of their love?
I think love hasn't ever hurt anybody, and committed love like the one between adult homo-/heterosexuals is a good thing. Hey, the more love in the world, the better!
2007-11-12 19:01:17 · answer #1 · answered by Maria - Godmother II of the AM 4 · 11⤊ 2⤋
No, i think not...
What you say as a "distortion" isn't really distortion or unnatural... I like to call it "change", which is more likely to be natural. You said it yourself that GOD has a plan for His creation BUT do you really know what His plans are.
People all over the world (in ALL religions) claims that their GOD(or Gods, Goddesses, etc.) is/are the highest form of being (divine as some say) and that HIS/HER/THEIR existence and being are too much for us humans (we puny little insignificant mere mortals) to comprehend. And yet the leaders/founders of this so-called religions claim this and that of their Gods, that this is His plans,etc.... Doesn't that contradict to what they are teaching that their God is profoundly subtle...
Although I may sound heretic, I strongly believe that there is a higher being, an immortal, all powerful GOD. I believe that everything happens for a reason. So, same sex marriage maybe some sort of an opening for a new path in evolution....
If it was not God's will, will God allow it to happen? Think! If this same sex marriage would fail, then certainly it is unnatural!
2007-11-12 19:17:14 · answer #2 · answered by bboi_tan 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Left has opened a can of worms. even though if this is totally practically emotions, what should not be allowed to be referred to as marriage? i do unlike anyone having extra Rights / Privilege than yet another. on the different hand, the international has in no way been honest. What data do you have that it advantages Society? i will work out the way it advantages you. Being a common conniving man or woman & hating the taxman, if i needed my corporation to stay interior the relatives for generations i could use the marriage regulation to have my better half marry & pass on the sources tax loose to a youthful & get that guy or woman to do an identical. With this situation a grandparent must be youthful than their "offspring."
2016-11-11 08:37:06 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at it this way if you were in love with a guy or chick and wanted to be with them full time whats wrong with that ? Many people find love or there soul partner in same sex relationships. What they do together isn't anyone's business as long as they are happy and can experience love in all our very short life times what business or problem is it too any one else. Why don't you inform all of us who you are doing it with and give us all a day to day account how you and your love of your life or soul partner is in your relationship. I reckon you have no one in your life or have ever experienced true love in your life so you reflect your misery of not being truly loved onto others. God made someone for everyone and when you eventually fall in love you will understand what really makes the world go round.
2007-11-12 19:18:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where exactly did this idea of a traditional marriage come from anyhow.
As far as I can tell marriage was only a legal registration related to keeping track of inheritance rights. This seems to have changed to marrying for other reasons first in 18th century England.
I think if they had not been making such a mess out of it in the legal system for gays to pass on their property rights this whole gay marriage thing never would have come up at all.
Then of course your lunatic televangelists did not help at all by turning it into a big overblown issue.
Tell me, while you have been worried about whether or not gays should be alklowed to register as a couple, what other laws removing your rights to life liberty and freedom has your Govt. passed
2007-11-12 19:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The real perversion is trying to twist homophobia into "love." We have those promoting the anti-gay agenda telling us that sex outside of marriage is wrong. They call it fornication and say we are sinful for engaging in fornication. But then they tell us we cannot get married, because their homophobia should be the basis for the laws we all live under. My question is why are they promoting fornication among gay people if fornication is a sin?
2007-11-12 19:16:26 · answer #6 · answered by Michael B - Prop. 8 Repealed! 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Whine all you like.
We'll still live free and will not cave to scare tactics from the pro-theocracy bunch. Your notion of perversion is anything that does not follow your strict religious beliefs. Just don't waste public tax dollars enforcing it.
P.S. Computers aren't natural either. According to Genesis, all men should till the land. Score.
2007-11-12 19:07:37 · answer #7 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The only time I would assume that God had an "plan" was if God told me it, himself. Perversion is in the mind of the human, not in God. Ya ever hear the saying "God does not create junk". People are people, Gay, lesbian, bi, or straight. God loves all of us-- Christian, Atheist, Pagan, Jew, so on, so on, and Gay, lesbian, and bi as well. If I can assume what the original plan was, it might have been to just love one another whatever the he** you are.
2007-11-12 19:16:24 · answer #8 · answered by coffee_moon_nana 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No one can prove whether God even exists let alone what plan God might have if it has one. You have certain religious beliefs and that is your right. Your right to never be gay. It is not right for you to impose your unprovable religious beliefs onto others who don't share them. That is religious discrimination. If someone is not harming you through their actions they should be afforded human rights to follow their beliefs and live as they wish in peace. Homosexuality is found in nature. There are animals that exhibit homosexual behavior. What if you lived as a Christian in a Jewish nation that tried to dictate their beliefs on you. How do you feel about Christians being persecuted in Islamic nations? Its the same deal. If human rights are to count for anything they have to allow freedom of life choices and personal beliefs for everyone so long as they aren't infringing on other's rights.
2007-11-12 19:08:57 · answer #9 · answered by Zen Pirate 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
There is no rational, legitimate or legally justifiable reason why two consenting adults of either gender should be restricted from getting married if that is their wish. All reasons given for restricting same-gender marriage are emotionally and biased based.
2007-11-12 19:11:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋