Do you agree with the following quote about relationships?

Question

I read this in a dating for dummies book:

"Relationships need frequent, in person quality time to thrive."

Agree or disagree?

I agree with it, but a friend of mine disagrees. He's divorced and commitment phobic. I think it's true because you can't really know someone and have a relationship if you never see the person. Email, phone and IM are fine, but it's not the same. I think that's why long distance relationships don't often work out. He thinks that because that's my belief that I'm setting myself up for failure with dating. We're just friends btw (I'm 28 and he's 60)...so this isn't about me and him. Just wondered what others' thoughts were.

Answer 1

i agree...you need to see someone in person from time to time. talking and emailing are fine...but a hug or a kiss can't be felt by phone or email.

Answer 2

Although i agree that having quality time face to face is important i dont' think its the most important, i just want to comment that long distance relationship can work. I've been in one for 4 years !!! He lives in Germany and i'm in the US. We started dating at 16 and now we are 20. Based on the complaints from my friends my relationship is a lot stronger than theres. Because a LDR takes a lot of communication, trust and honesty we know a lot about eachother. He knows all my secrets and i know his. Yes, emails, phone and IM are not the same but it does not mean that we are doomed. We look at the distance as a test of our love, we are so devoted that we can survive this, we know it will not be forever. Also, long distance relationships can have webcams now, so we do get to see eachother online. Thats just my opinion. :)

Answer 3

I think that your friend is hoping you won't take the plunge. It's pretty obvious that any relationship needs nurturing - even platonic friendships. Only the truly selfish and self absorbed could believe such a thing. Long distance relationships have worked for me when I was in the middle of them, but not at the beginning. My husband and I have lived apart throughout our 25 year marriage. Normally he would be transfered ahead, and I would stay and wrap things up before moving to be with him. Sometimes this would go on for months at a time. Six months was the longest we ever kept things going apart. I'm sure there are people out there that do it successfully, but it is really hard, and I don't think most realationships survive it.

Answer 4

I would think so. It certainly isn't bad and it's bound to help. I don't 100% disagree with long-distance relationships but obviously it's much harder to keep it going if you never see the person. "In person quality time" is great and a definite help for relationships.

Answer 5

I fairly accept as true with the 2d. the 1st-- no longer plenty. the reason? the 2d confines itself to data, jointly as the 1st makes a bunch of arguable and unsubstantiated allegations. Ellerbe smuggles her very own imaginative and prescient of spirituality into the communicate and makes use of it as an unjustified common by making use of which she measures the Church. this is an unlucky occasion of the prejudice and pseudo-intellectualism that plagues modern historic writing. i'm a house builder by making use of commerce. And one element i've got discovered is that this is impossible to construct something which could't be picked aside by making use of somebody who's set to discover imperfections. i'm no longer saying that Church history is composed of no darkness (endure in innovations, I accept as true with the Pope), yet Ellerby's therapy is so biased as to generate distortion. She fails to understand that the very ethical outrage she expresses is a legacy of the Christian Church. This analysis has no longer something to do with my very own non secular perspectives. this is my training as a historian that makes me wince as quickly as I study issues like this. that's an argument of workmanship, no longer ideology, for me. And Ellerby's artwork in basic terms would not make the grade as historic scholarship. peace Edit: interpreting your comments, i think I ought to back say that the Church has dedicated adverse crimes. there is not any excuse, different than the wickedness of those in ability on the time, for what has been carried out. I neither excuse previous Christians, nor dissociate myself from them. the religion that I belong to did those issues. All i will do is attempt to confirm it in no way happens back. 2d edit: honest sufficient. however the documentation you point out is *no longer* component to the Ellerby quote you used, and you asked for my opinion of it. Had you used between the others you call, my assessment could have contemplated their better scholarship.

Answer 6

Agree...totally!!

Answer 7

"Relationships need frequent, in person quality time to thrive."

AGREE

Answer 8

i definetly agree with it!!! if you are in a relationship obviously you should be close. the only way to be close to someone is if you spend time with them and often.

Answer 9

i agree, but i also think it's important to have away time from each other too, so you can have time to miss them.