Where`s the science in creation science?

Answer 1

Only in the name "Creation Science" They figure, as long as it's in the name, it's as scientific as the "Theory of Evolution" actually, more scientific because it calls itself "Science" instead of a "Theory." Creation wins by name alone by their reasoning.

Answer 2

There are actually some scientific aspects to it and it is disingenuous to dismiss it of hand as so many people do here. Now, I am not saying that I agree with their ideas, but to be able to better combat this kind of religious endoctrination dresses up as science we better understand what they are.

The science is in their explanation of the evolution process and it focuses mostly on complex biological aparatus that is difficult to explain as purely a result of evolution. This is mostly based on something called "flagellum" (search for it). This aparatus needs more than 20 different parts that none of them would appear to be useful by itself, therefore it would be difficult to evolve all of the pieces together. Therefore, so they say, there must be something intelligent behind its creation. They also use mathematical formulas to compute the likelihood that all these gene mutations would happen by chance, and of course they get the results they want.

You did not ask how to rebuke this pseudo-scientific reasoning, so I will let you search for it :-)

Answer 3

What do you mean with the aid of significant? in case you mean sensible, then that may not difficult to respond to. technological know-how provides us technologies, so issues like properties, vehicles, drugs, telephones, computers, the internet, in certainty each and every thing which permits the society we've outfitted as much as function. faith provides us intolerance and conflict, to no longer point out slowing the form of technological know-how (and, whilst that's ascendant sufficient, struggling with it completely, purely verify out the dark an prolonged time or loads of the midsection east now, how plenty learn comes out of there?). So i will take technological know-how palms down, i do no longer even would desire to think of roughly it. Oh, and as for once you will desire to question the bible, you will desire to start with the aid of thinking it, I see no particular distinctive function of the e book which you will desire to assume that's genuine till shown fake, if a declare in the bible won't be able to be substianted (and particularly some, many claims there can't) then I see no reason to have self assurance it purely because of fact some semiliterate shepherds for the duration of the bronze age did.

Answer 4

There is no science in creation science. They tacked 'science ' on the end to make creation to look more appealing to the ignorant people who don't actually understand science.

Answer 5

Hanging out with Santa, the Easter Bunny the Tooth Fairy, Underwear Knomes and El Chupacabra.

-S-

Answer 6

It is surprisingly missing. I really thought the words creation and science in one sentence had to make it true.

Answer 7

the other day i came across an article entitled 'Modern Creationary Theory' ah ha ha... it appeared very science like but wasn't at all.

Answer 8

Bound and gagged in a dark room! Quick we must free it!

Answer 9

You'll find the last parts of it right around the 17th century or so.

Answer 10

I can't imagine it being a science! there is no research!