Dya fink every1 in the uk should supply DNA to the cops???
It would save a lot o bad crime!!!
2007-11-12 09:33:31 · 13 answers · asked by treehugger2k7 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
This is one of those questions were you're damned no matter what you answer.
If I say that I feel it will violate my right to privacy then someone somewhere will jump up and down about having things to hide.
If I say it is a good idea then someone else will spout on about civil rights infringements.
Unfortunately for me it boils down to the trust I have in Government and the police...........ooops I think I just said NO WAY !
2007-11-12 09:44:33 · answer #1 · answered by Dee L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally I am all for it. Human Rights people will disagree as they say it is infringing, blah, blah. What a load of nonsense. If you are a law abiding citizen then you don't have anything to hide. Plus a National DNA register would be useful for medical purposes. Matching rare blood and bone marrow donors for a start. I would also like to go a bit further and propose that a way of tagging new borns be devised and that could be turned off when they reach 18. A method like that whereby the police could trace someone via satellite would eliminate the distress caused by missing children, ie Madeline McCann.
2007-11-12 09:52:05 · answer #2 · answered by dozyllama 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liverpool Chelsea Aston Villa Arsenal Wigan Athletic Hull city Fulham West Ham Newcastle United Bolton Wanderers Sunderland Portsmouth Manchester city Middlesbrough Stoke city Tottenham Hotspur Blackburn Rovers or West Bromwich for the p.c. out :)
2016-10-02 05:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, to the DNA. I would do it. You not only might solve crimes faster but it may also save the lives of others in some cases like diseases...aids and such. If a policeman were to pull someone over and their DNA was on file and it showed they had aids or something else...the officer would know to handle them with gloves or whatever was needed to avoid unsafe germ contact.
2007-11-12 09:43:27 · answer #4 · answered by Soniafrompa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It wouldn't "save a lot of bad crime." It would allow for a greater rate of success for discovering who was present at those crimes (or scenes).
I am for a compulsory DNA database for numerous reasons: Missing person identification, crime solving, and other medical reasons.
It wouldn't be the cure all for crime or missing persons but it would be a step in the right direction.
2007-11-12 09:40:34 · answer #5 · answered by wykedguy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No the crime and security thing is a load of rubbish. granted it sounds good but remember the real political affiliations of those who propose it. The I don't go round breaking the law and therefore have nothing to fear need to be aware that another word should be added. "YET"
2007-11-12 09:49:16 · answer #6 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the US of you go to jail for anything now, they will take a DNA sample for the database.
2007-11-12 09:42:49 · answer #7 · answered by Kevy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would also provide the opportunity to catch up with some of these absent fathers too.
Although Jeremy Kyle would be out of a job.......
2007-11-12 09:41:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It could be a good idea if it was applied properly and no mistakes were made.
2007-11-12 09:41:31 · answer #9 · answered by norma d 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Things would be so much simpler if it was compulsory to do so. But I can also see how ppl would see it as an invasion of privicy too. But if you've got nothing to hide eh.......................................
2007-11-12 09:39:25 · answer #10 · answered by Smiles 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋