Do you think this makes sense?

Question

I saw this a few moments ago and was wondering if any one thinks it makes sense to them or if there is even a possibilty of it being true?


There is a big debate between people who stand by The big Bang theory and the people who stand by Creation. Both sides of the debate feel that they are correct, and that the other is wrong. The big question is, “Did the universe come from a super dense particle or was it created by God?” The important thing to point out is that this question is a false dichotomy. Everyone wants it to be one or the other, but it is possible that both theories are true.

The truth is that God may have created the particle that expanded into all that you see. If he did, this would not conflict with the Bible or modern science books. It supports creation in that God created the universe. It also supports The Big Bang theory in that there was a small particle which expanded. We really can’t know, but an important fact to remember is that the bible has not changed since it was written, science books need to be rewritten constantly.

The Big Bang theory only works if God created it, because the matter that particle was made of could not exist on its own. The law of conversation of matter prohibits it. This would mean that the only way anything could exist, is for something outside of our reality must have created it. The Big Bang theory needs God to make it work.

Science books do not mention the existence of God. The Bible does not mention science very often. They are both written in their own context, and for different reasons. Science books are to teach us about the way the universe works. The Bible was written to teach about God, Jesus, and to save our soul. They can both be valid and coexist together, just so long as the people behind them can do the same.

Jen:Congratulations your typing,Im proud of you.

Great gazoo: Actually I never said anything at all. I never said wether I agreed with this or not. I said in my question that its something I found and was just wanting opinions.

To everyone: Here is the link I got this from there is other things as well.
http://inferredlogic.googlepages.com/index.htm

Gantz: Dry the tears its not that bad.

One last time people: I Did not make this stuff up! I copied from the link I provided. Its someone elses opinion I was just asking so please stop referring to it as my opinion.

Answer 1

I agree there is the chance that both sides are correct in certain ways.

Answer 2

I'm a Christian and belive in God and that Jesus is God's son. But what if you are an atheist and belive there is no
God at all any kind of god and just think you are there, I'm pretty sure I'm getting atheism wrong but then again it is not my faith so I dont study it for school or was tought this as a child. But lets just say you are an atheist, and you do not belive in God or any gods, than the Big Bang theory is what you belive, you wont belive that God created the earth and everything that inhabits it. So now (you being an atheist) you wont belive that God or any gods created that one particle that created the earth and its inhabitants.

And what you said could entirely be true, but than how did people get here? How did any thing get here? Were animals and humans created in the Big Bang? If you thing they are then the Christan theory and The Big Bang theory do not work because Christans belive that God created Adam and Eve and everyone is their desendents. So really it just depends on what you belive in, everyone has their own opinion in everything.

Answer 3

It "makes sense" to me, I see nothing that contradicts each other, why could God not have created the big bang? The bible supplies no specifics as to how God went about creation.
I will say however, the "Big Bang theory only working in the existence of God" part is not necessarily true. It is a bit of a"which came first, chicken or egg". If you feel you MUST answer the 'were did the dense particle come from", then you must answer the 'were did God come from". Whatever answer you come up with for God... you can use that for the dense particle.

Answer 4

There are several things wrong with this statement.

1. Claiming that the bible hasn't changed since it was written, is verifiably not true. There are hundreds of different versions of the bible, and every time a new ancient copy is found, there are always differences.

2. Matter doesn't appear to be finite in nature, meaning that it changes, but doesn't turn into nothingness. If you burn a piece of paper, it will change, but the matter still exists, in the form of energy, hydrogen, carbon and dioxcide.

3. The Big Bang definitely doesn't require a God, in order for it to work. This was written by a religious person who is trying desperately to grasp at straws to maintain belief.

Answer 5

I even have suggested till now that, existence is stranger than something we are able to assert approximately it, honestly everyone that would not know this fact is the two asleep or in denial, that's no insult, it takes a good jolt to wake us from our close eye and see how ridiculous the international is the place we've words like ( regular ) I even have not solved the acceptable riddle, yet there's a definite information, or incredibly a feeling, that i'm on the acceptable course, on the acceptable place and on the acceptable time. the uncomplicated regulations in the matrix of the fabric international are comprehensible by utilising many different ideals, yet maximum grant a touchdown field for the complacent, and countless supply up there. If we enable ourselves an open techniques and dare to be attentive to, at times reason will talk. could Kali prosper you frequently!

Answer 6

i believe both are right. a lot of people think of god in a human form but God is dynamic energy. a energy so great that the human mind just cant fathom it. God makes all things so most likely he made and put into motion every thing behind the big bang. the bible also tells us how the animals were made it just doesn't go into the small details. just one day to god could be millions or billions of years to us. so why cant both be right. and think about this there is too much detail in every thing from the smallest ant to the highest mountain for god not to have taken his time

Answer 7

Gen.1:1,2; All exist [ man says sun is 4.5 billion ], so all exist when the book begans at year 2513, 857 years after the flood, Gen.50:26; Josephs dies year 2368, 712 years after the flood to end the book of Genesis, and who ever had done the book of Genesis, all existed then as well, man is last here, and Abraham was 430 years before Exodus, and he was 427 years after the flood, at age 75 to get the Promised Land covenant.

Job 38:4-7,30-32 [ space ]; Heavens inhabitants called morning stars and sons of God, see ages and ages old earth prepared ages for intended inhabitant.

Answer 8

I think you make a valid point. Most scientific theories only strengthen the fact that there is a God since God can do things outside the laws of physics.

Answer 9

I think the question of weather an all powerful being sparked the big bang goes beyond the knowledge of both science and religion and if it did happen, there would be no way to know.

Answer 10

The truth is that there is no reason to think that any god was involved.

There is lots of evidence that gods are made made. You only have to look at the history and texts of each religion to see that.

The fact that science books change is the strength of science. Religion makes arbitrary claims and is mostly unyielding, even in the face of evidence. Science doesn't claim to know anything absolutely. It changes and refines its body of knowledge as we learn more. Religion is unlearning.