^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2007-11-12 08:45:56 · 57 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Science, it has a lot more support.
2007-11-12 08:47:46 · answer #1 · answered by Ode to the Damned® ÆA NR 6 · 10⤊ 8⤋
This is a strangely loaded question. EVERYONE believes in science. For example: (elementary school) what comes first? A butterfly or a caterpillar? A caterpillar. (middle school) What is at the middle of a cell? A nucleus. (high school) And can you name ONE element on the periodic table? Of course you can. (life) You've heard of bacteria, fungus and viral infections, right? Yes! That's aaalllllll science.
The question isn't either/or... it's which do you trust MORE. When the rubber meets the road, when your religion says one thing and science claims the opposite, which do you believe? Me personally, science. But it's not because I don't respect religion. It's just the way I am.
2007-11-12 09:00:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
For WHAT, exactly?
For spiritual truth, I believe the Bible.
For physical truth, I believe science.
Science can't comment on the supernatural. Science can't prove whether God exists or not.
Why would it have to be science OR the Bible? Why not both? The Bible was never meant to be a science book.
2007-11-12 08:56:35 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, I'm inbetween. Science is true, and I believe in it, but I am also a tiny bit religious. I believe that God is here, but I don't take the Bible too literally. I think the Bible is heavily symbolic, and is supposed to be interpreted symbolically, so neither the Bible or Science is right or wrong. So I'm sort of an inbetween.
2007-11-12 08:57:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Science!!
2007-11-12 08:52:22 · answer #5 · answered by Cory C 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Science.
2007-11-12 08:48:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
Neither, science doesn't require faith. Science is the study and collection of evidence, when enough evidence is collected, concrete conclusions can be drawn, as in evolution, which is supported by endless amounts of evidence, fossils, direct observences, etc.
The Bible is about the last thing I'd put any stock into.
2007-11-12 08:51:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I beleive the truth. Faith says that a pot of water boils on the cooker. Science says that H2O in a solid metallic substance sets on another technological (not all technology is related to computers) contraption. The kinetic energy causes the molecules to.......etc.
The dummy who understands neither of the two before stumbling off on his own assumptions is who I ignore. Unlike science though, God never changes.
2007-11-12 09:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by F'sho 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Science doesn't have anything to do with believing. I accept the truth that is science, I don't have to believe in anything, it's factual. The Bible is a collection of vague fabels and myths that people can interpret any way they want.
I pick science.
2007-11-12 08:51:06 · answer #9 · answered by Uh-oh 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Science 100%
Bible 0%
2007-11-12 08:49:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 4⤋
Science.
2007-11-12 08:48:14 · answer #11 · answered by Eye see! 6 · 9⤊ 3⤋