These weapons look alike because Taurus and S&W are trying to copy Glock. If you want a great weapon, get the Glock.
2007-11-12 08:00:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Baron K 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I'm still trying to figure out how a Taurus or a SW looks like a Glock, Unless you;re talking about the squared off rear end, due to no hammer. The taurus 24/7 maybe slightly resembles the Glock, but only in the slide, the frame and grip is totally different. For the SW I'm assuming you're talking about the Sigma, that closest remembles the Glock. Only because it has a hammerless design and squared off rear. The glock is more box like, the Sigma has a trapezoidal contour.
The differences in these 3 are far too many to list here, and which one is better is a matter of great debate, much like comparing ford chevy and dodge.
2007-11-12 08:14:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by boker_magnum 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Glock was the first to design a good polymer framed high capacity semi-automatic pistol and when other gun makers got over their anti-polymer prejudices they quickly tried to copy the Glock/ When the S&W Sigma first came out I saw one at a gun shop and asked to examine it and a Glock. I disassembled both and placed all the parts on the counter, deliberately placing the Glock slide above the S&W. They looked so much alike that the clerk tried to assemble the S&W frame onto the Glock slide. It was funny to see how close a copy the Sigma was.
Glocks are made to handle higher pressures than almost any other pistol, and the person who said you can't shoot reloads in a Glock has been severly misled. I have 3 Glocks, a 20, 23, and 29, and shoot reloads in them all. The 20 and 29 are 20mms, and I use 190 grain bullets loaded with maximum reccomended powder charges. They get 1200 feet per second in my model 20. I've shot about 4000 reloads in my 20 and it shoots better now than when it was new.
If you are thinking about buying a pistol, you will not regret choosing a Glock. There are reasons others have tried to copy Glocks...
2007-11-12 10:56:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by mountainclass 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I fairly have a Glock 17 and my spouse has a Glock 19. you ought to use the 17 mags interior the nineteen (they are going to stick out some) yet no longer any incorrect way around. the nineteen has a shorter grip for smaller palms or extra ordinary concealing in case you prefer to hold it. they are in all likelihood the two third technology weapons which could have an fundamental gentle rail on it. neither is 'better' than the different apart from length. The 17 must be slightly extra precise as a results of longer barrel and the nineteen extra concealable. For objective prepare the 9mm is annoying to conquer in an entire length, finished ability gun. For my hid carry weapon I carry a Kimber professional CDP 1911 form pistol in .40 5 ACP. :-) If i'm going 4 wheeling or boating I carry the Glock because of the fact it is going to shoot even though how grimy that's. ;-) i assume i'm blessed by making use of living in Texas because of the fact I fairly have 2 or 3 sellers in my section that sell Glocks beginning at $469.00. i offered my technology 3 OD green G17 for $419.00 in basic terms after the attack ban sunset inspite of the undeniable fact that it become with 2 10 around mags. those with 2 17 around mags have been $439.00 then.
2016-11-11 06:55:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why does a Taurus look like an Accord look like a Camry?
Ever since the first polymer framed pistol was introduced by Heckler & Koch in 1970, people have been duplicating the then revolutionary, "futuristic" look.
That look has now become commonplace with imitators like Glock being so popular and so everyone needs to get on the bandwagon.
While these guns may look similar to the untrained eye, they are very different. You need to handle each one to see which one feels good to you, you need to determine a budget and you need to do some research on each one to make an informed personal decision.
I hear good things about the Taurus, but they do have a well-deserved reputation for being a cheaper knock-off.
Stay away from Smith &Wesson semi-autos. They have a terrible track record.
Don't buy the Glock, as it has no safety and a horrible trigger pull. You want a semi-auto with an actual safety lever, in my opinion.
Look at the HK and the SIG Sauer.....two of the best pistols made in the world today. There is no bad choice here....no buyers regret....and no rapid depreciation in value like the ones you mentioned.
If you could get yourself a Mercedes-Benz S-class for a couple of hundred dollars more than the Ford Taurus, wouldn't you?
2007-11-12 08:36:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by DJ 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Glocks are a lower class weapon and are durable most of the time with a few problems
Taurus is even lower yet they have an alright rep.
S&W is a decent way to go.
Understand this, if you put reloaded rounds into a Glock. It will explode in your hand and being that reloaded rounds (Cheap refilled ammo) are cheaper and you didn't name models, you're probably like majority of us gun owners and sometimes just buy cheap ammo without looking. Polymer weapons are great because they're light and etc. But in humid areas they tend to crack, and it's a little more difficult to fix than just buying new grips.
Btw friendly tip, whenever you're getting a gun or looking at a gun. Go with what feels best to you. You really shouldn't pick a gun because the way it looks though, guns should be used for functionality not for the style.
2007-11-12 09:46:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Glock is the first manufactire to use polymer for their receivers. S&W and Taurus and the johnney come latelies try their best to imitate the Glock. Glocks are the best in many people's mind,including mine.
2007-11-12 10:12:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because Glock Started the polymer craze, Taurus has never had a design they didn't copy or steal from other manufacturers, and S&W improved upon Glocks design. Go for a Springfield XD, best of them all.
2007-11-12 08:09:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
everyone copied off the glock. The S&W and taurus are look alikes
2007-11-12 10:23:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ALK 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
They all tend to copy each other. if your looking for something that is both single action and double and also 100% reliable, then go sig. if looking for reliable with power then a 1911 is the way to go.. taurus is good and cheaper, s&w is great but paying for the name. But if your looking for top of the line--then again I say go sig.
2007-11-12 11:45:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gary S 1
·
2⤊
0⤋