Why else would Pat Robertson endorse Giuliani?
2007-11-12 07:32:55 · 54 answers · asked by Murazor 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
something that does not exist does not have a mind to change
2007-11-12 07:35:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 9⤋
More likely God has changed His mind about Pat Robertson, or that Pat Robertson thinks he (and other Christians) could change the mind of Giuliani if he were to be elected.
In all seriousness, I guess Robertson is trying to think pragmatically and choose the Republican candidate that has the best chance of beating a Democrat and thus being the lesser of two evils. Not saying that's the right approach, just speculating as to his thought process.
Me, I'm hoping that somehow Mike Huckabee stands a chance!
2007-11-12 07:37:34 · answer #2 · answered by arklatexrat 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i won't be able to keep in mind something particular, no. i'm a medical Pantheist, someplace between Deists and Atheists, and that has no longer replaced. i'm greater like Carl Sagan than different "non secular" human beings. I see Jesus as an enlightened Sage, yet human--no longer divine. i do in comparison to religions like Xianity and Islam, even if I approve of Buddhism and Hinduism. I even have discovered plenty approximately how the two sexes see one yet another, and frequently I even have discovered the "flavor" of the greater youthful technology(s) (i'm an oldie, sixty one). yet i'm actual set in my approaches and would say that in many cases R&S has been a sturdy use of time, a gamble to fulfill new human beings and study some "nuggets" from a number of them (Kitten and only Be) --yet has no longer probably replaced me in a heavily significant way, nor replaced my perspectives on abortion or what else. (i do in comparison to abortion, by using the way, besides the undeniable fact that it somewhat is in all possibility a mandatory evil. Why no longer in basic terms stay on the pill, or do oral intercourse? we've too many toddlers interior the international because it somewhat is.!)
2016-10-02 05:15:43 · answer #3 · answered by prindle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since when does Pat Robertson represent God?
2007-11-12 07:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by It's the hair 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
You look to Pat Robertson to figure out what God thinks?
Sad.
2007-11-12 07:42:00 · answer #5 · answered by pixie_pagan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pat Robertson is not God, for your information. God never changes, God knows it all.
2007-11-12 07:36:53 · answer #6 · answered by calle trece 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I guess I didn't realize Pat Robertson was God.
2007-11-12 07:35:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Sane, intelligent Liberals and Conservatives realized some time ago that Pat Robertson has lost his fricking mind! Nothing he does is of any importance except to his non-thinking lemmings. (Sorry, that was redundant.) ; )
2007-11-12 07:38:57 · answer #8 · answered by susanmaried 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no, He has not. he has not changed his mind about the sinfullness of man either. Pat Robertson is sinful like everyone else. God doesn't change his mind...ever. He's eternal and not bound by space and time. The universe would not exist if God had ever or ever will or does change his mind.
2007-11-12 07:37:57 · answer #9 · answered by glowbalworming 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Who knows? In the old days, God would come out with new books every so often. Old Testament, New Testament, Qur'an, Book of Mormon. But there's been nothing since, not even a press release or a podcast or an appearance on Larry King, so we have no idea what he's been thinking the past 175 years or so.
2007-11-12 07:39:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No he hasnt but i always said he did not have anything against Gays and it was said it was wrong in the bible because in those times it wasn't acceptable so i have always believed that was put in there because of personal beliefs not because it was word of God (I am christian) because i have been taught first and foremost God loves everyone no matter what.
Abortion, he hasn't, i am not really for it but i think there is personal choice in it, though it is deffinately not for me; but more things are becoming socially acceptable.
2007-11-12 07:42:48 · answer #11 · answered by nonoodles74 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋