theres a difference between sanity and utter stupidity.
2007-11-12 07:10:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
11⤋
First! You have to ask "Are the people who voted for him sane...?". Well I think Mr Bush is definitely clueless and yes even a bit insane but then again he doesn't exactly make the decisions regarding international policy anyway. He is a figure head, a singular unit that we see as responsible for all mistakes his party makes. I'd blame his entourage of insane advisers who make all the decisions for him, he is basically the spokesperson for their ideas. Considering all efforts to make Iraq a democracy (that was run by a fascist regime for many years) I'd guess the whole thing is insane. The international policy is definitely insane.
2007-11-13 18:11:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lloyd S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any reasonable person, whose mind is not saturated with political rhetoric and rubbish they've watched on TV, will tell you that the president is neither stupid nor insane. Think what you will about the man's policies, he is at least doing what he thinks is best regardless of what happens to his popularity... and I'd rather have a president more concerned with the welfare of this country and about my right to live without the threat of terrorism than he is about a petty popularity contest. That, and having met the man myself, I can vouch for his sanity. I say this, too, as someone who went to war under his orders, and have actually seen with my own eyes what is at stake over there--and can therefore vouch for the utter bias and inexplicable madness being shown by American media and the Democratic Party currently. This war--nor any war--should be governed by domestic popularity contests and people who have neither had to lift a finger to contribute, much less been inconvenienced by it. Or would you consider ending a war prematurely and dooming an entire geographical region to years of worse strife than it is seeing now just so you can gloat here at home not "insane" in and of itself?
If so, you SERIOUSLY need to reevaluate your priorities.
I might also point out... every single detractor who has jumped on the bandwagon to insult the president; do they offer any legitimate reasons or arguments for their opinion, or do they strike you as having any kind of eloquence or intelligence based on their English-impaired answers? I thought not.
2007-11-12 09:03:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ಠ__ಠ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would say he is sane, this question is stupid and childish at best!
I don't like the way he conducts the peoples business but, he is the President of The United States like it or not!
How about doing your civic responsibility and Voting or volunteering your time to a political organization instead of slandering a man that obviously wont listen to reason or his advisers or Congress or the UN or the Senate or even his own Father!
2007-11-12 07:45:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
In no way is this man sane. One thing I believe that many people may have forgotten is he is an alcoholic and once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. Even once the drinking has stopped the alcoholic mindset remains and continuous treatment has to be maintained.
He is a disaster already happened and I do not understand how or why his crimes against this nation and humanity are not stopped.
I am in no way knowledgable enough to say what should be done, but I do know he is a criminal and should be held accountable.
2007-11-12 07:51:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by greenpiper 4
·
1⤊
4⤋
When u find out let us know the U.S. and the world as a whole is waiting to know that answer as well.
2007-11-16 07:11:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dark Shadows 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
PRESIDENT George W. Bush IS very sane!
2007-11-12 07:48:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Absolutely. The world he deals with is not.
2007-11-12 08:16:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by baileybc 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
George W is just a patsy. He is just doing what he is told, as have most recent presidents. One exception was JFK, and he was killed because "he thought he was in charge" according to one pundit.
George is obeying "The Powers That Be" (see the Bilderberg Group), with coaching from his daddy, Bush Sr., Dick Cheney, and others... He is not smart enough to do things by himself.
2007-11-12 07:19:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by pstottmfc 5
·
1⤊
6⤋
And the military part of your question would be?
2007-11-12 09:39:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would have to say, NO!!! He seems to go further and further in the "leftfield" everyday. Correct me if I'm wrong, but he was just over with the French being buddy, buddy and they just declared the Iranians enemy of some sort. I do believe someone used the words --- World War III around him......You know how war hungry Bush is.
As the famous line from a certain spiked-haired aerobic queen used to go --- "STOP the INSANITY". ;)
2007-11-12 07:14:09
·
answer #11
·
answered by George G 2
·
4⤊
7⤋