If they KNOW they are right, why should it matter what proofs Richard Dawkins comes forward with, in an attempt to disprove god. Why aren't they just content in knowing that they are right and he is wrong? Or is it because the proofs that the religious are refuting are so dangerous to religion that they must be stopped? Answers from both sides of the argument are welcome.
2007-11-12 04:28:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm not a creationist, but I disagree with Richard Dawkins. While a literal interpretation of the biblical creation stories and the flood has been disproved by science, God can neither be proved or disproved. In my opinion, Dawkins goes too far when he says God can be disproved.
2007-11-12 05:58:20 · answer #1 · answered by lilagrubb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even a lot of evolutionists hate him such as myself for being an annoying hypocrite who shoves his beliefs on others just like the Christians do. He is basically a religious atheist who are ******* annoying just like those weidos outside my work passing out Jesus tracts with signs of doomsday
2007-11-12 12:36:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who ?? Does he have proof... I thought he has theories.. He cannot disprove God, nor can his theories be PROVEN..It is all called OPINION.... God Bless You !!
2007-11-12 12:45:05 · answer #3 · answered by timmyboy26164 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont hate him...he is a fool Psalm 14:1 and jesus died for him
2007-11-12 12:32:54 · answer #4 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
dk him...dont hate anyone
2007-11-12 12:34:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋