I almost got thrown out of my creationism class once already -- when the teacher asked for examples of intelligent design, I raised my hand and shouted ADAM'S NIPPLES.
Word to the wise: If you're going to be taking a course in church science next semester, don't be too eager with your answers until you know what's going on.
What? Oh, you're welcome --
2007-11-12 03:21:44 · 9 answers · asked by 2.71828182845904 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
A class in Mythological Science you mean. How moronic. That is about as dumb as Compassionate Conservative.
Why is it that people think they can tack Science to the end of anything to make it seem intelligent and real?
I recommend you do something more productive like take a class in Fart-Science.
2007-11-12 03:29:24 · answer #1 · answered by Atrum Animus AM 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes, yes, you are very funny. Whether Adam had nipples or not, we cannot know, but there are two good reasons for nipples on men:
-Nipples are especially sensitive and are a source of sexual stimuli, even for many men.
-Nipples are the result of an efficient plan of embryonic development. Human embryos contain characteristics of both sexes at first, because they all have basically the same genetic information. It is design economy. For example, in all human embryos, at first both the mullerian duct system (female) and the wolffian duct system (male) develop, because both sexes have the genetic information for these structures. Incidentally, this refutes the urban myth that human embryos "start out female."
2007-11-13 17:23:31 · answer #2 · answered by Questioner 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That sounds crazy to me. Church science -- it's catchy but crazy. The kind of thing you can learn just by reading Bibles, you don't need a course.
2007-11-12 12:06:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
One thing - church science is not science, its religious indoctrination. The difference is, science is looking for explanations as to what happens, how and why. so-called church 'science' is all about trying to fit the bible in to match the things that science has already proved. in short, its a crock of shite.
2007-11-12 11:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by ramrod cowfins 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good answer! I wouldn't take a course in "church science" until it was shown to be science.
2007-11-12 11:28:26 · answer #5 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Church science? Sound like Penguin-flying lessons.
P.S. i've heard that men have nipples becuase all babies are born girls till the testosterone (or boy-hormone) kicks in and they become boys, by which time they have nipples. If im wrong please stop me now.
2007-11-12 11:38:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oxymoron.
2007-11-12 11:30:22 · answer #7 · answered by Lionheart ® 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is "Apologetics" not Church Science..
I know what you mean!!! and I give you a star!
2007-11-12 11:28:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have never heard of it and no am not taking it.
2007-11-12 11:29:54 · answer #9 · answered by Mim 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋