Is it a good idea to try to create the United States of Planet Earth?

Question

btw - I'm not American.

Nor do I even want to be American. I do however like the American constitution and in a world where there is no good system of government it seems to be the lesser of many evils.

Answer 1

No! its a bad idea!

Answer 2

No. The better idea is to try to move the human species beyond our dependence upon the childish idea of sovereignty. When you speak of a "United States of Planet Earth," the implication is, so far as I understand you, that all the people of the earth should think of themselves as a single unitary sovereign, empowering a single over-arching government. Frankly, though, that is precisely the wrong direction for progress. Getting along together without this sort of reliance on status, privilege, and hierarchy that statism necessarily entails ... that is the right direction.

Answer 3

The only way that could happen, or something like it, is if there is an outside enemy that all humans can rally against. Because aliens don't exist that ain't gunna happen.

Other than that, a one world government as you propose, would be dangerous to the citizens. There would be no checks and balances. The government would become dangerous to it people and un stoppable. I think there needs to be more than one government for our own good.

Maybe it would be a better place if we all could just let other countries govern themselves and keep our noses out of it. Maybe we should appreciate cultures rather than try to convert them over to be like us.

Maybe what you are trying to achieve can be achieved by appreciating other cultures and governments as they are and not try and make them like you.

Answer 4

No chance of that. Not even if the draft is reinstated. The world is becoming the United States of Greed. That is an entity that pretends to national identity while it drowns out cultures and replaces them with local ways to spend your money.

Answer 5

no, because earth's civilians are too diverse. everyone has their own political ideas, religious views, government, and everything. plus, it'd be hard for any single person to manage evrything going on in the world. that means one country or two might get neglected while others get all the attention. the "king" would have to divide the countries to his "generals" to rule a certain area, mutiny may occur, or even fighting over boundaries. nah, no good making a us with earth.

Answer 6

Not if "state's rights" are not properly observed. They are not observed now. The basis of state's rights is the theory that issues closest to the people affected are better left to those affected.
This does not mean some things cannot be given to the Federal Government. Our Constitution gave the proper functions to it, but failed miserably to protect it from Federal overview of everything.

Answer 7

Amshal Mayor Rothschild eat your heart out little one. Do you reside under a small stone in Weybridge someplace. i think all of us stay in peace and anybody exterior this worldwide backyard of eden can come and bypass in peace additionally i think. guy your naive, regrettably you havnt heard of Zionism, coz on the top of the rainbow isn't a pot of gold as its in all risk a thermo nuclear/ organic and organic weapon website, that gonna get you. be careful out, by means of fact the illuminati is when you for copyright infringement.

Answer 8

We must do this If we ever want to join the United Federation Of Planets.

Answer 9

Are you talking about the plans of George Bush, Jr. to convert the entire planet earth to Texas Methodism using wars like his Iraq War to further his plan for domination of the entire universe?

Answer 10

No I don't think that's a good idea but i think its better if we join all of the currency in the world so we can have only one kind of currency, like they did in europe. I think that would lessen the poverty level because the universal "dollar" would be the same value everywere.

Answer 11

No, absolutely not. The Americans would want to be in ultimate charge