I just watched some videos on youtube. I know, there are alot of nut jobs on that website that will post any damn thing, but there are some videos of those planes with what they claim to be missle launchers attached to what are supposed to be civilian 747's. Are these photo shopped, can anyone give me links so I can read further?
2007-11-11 22:28:22 · 12 answers · asked by legendofjay 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
There were no missiles at all.
I have seen every photo and video available. I see nothing odd at all.
Except two civilian aircraft flying into the Towers.
2007-11-11 22:31:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I saw the same thing, there were no missiles,Look at the videos of the planes on CNN news you can see the planes clear enough to see there was nothing under them.How could 4 planes with passengers leave a major air port with rockets attached.This is just what the terriost want you to believe, their criminal act did not work and now they try and use us against each other.I don't like a lot of things our government does but this would be a impossible act. It would mean the military would be behind it and several hundred if not thousands civilians. How long could this be kept a secret with many people knowing it.
2007-11-12 06:48:56 · answer #2 · answered by gggggg 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There were no missiles (or a "pod") attached to the plane. This fantastic claim was investigated by Popular Mechanics at
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=2#thepod
QUOTE:
"One of the clearest, most widely seen pictures of the doomed jet's undercarriage was taken by photographer Rob Howard and published in New York magazine and elsewhere (opening page). PM sent a digital scan of the original photo to Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University.
Greeley is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of geological formations based on shadow and light effects.
After studying the high-resolution image and comparing it to photos of a Boeing 767-200ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod." "
2007-11-12 08:24:21 · answer #3 · answered by J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello. As far as I know, there were no added weapons attached to any of the planes.
1) HiJackers strike when the plane is airborne-how could they attach stuff?
2) A 747 is a giant chunk of steel, capable of doing plenty of damage itself.
3) Isn't it enough that American Citizens were kidnapped and murdered, without adding urban legend to the scenario?
I'm certain the photos you speak about are bogus, just through common sense.
2007-11-12 06:35:26 · answer #4 · answered by matenmoe 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. As all aircraft involved in September 11th were civilian in origin, there were no missiles on the wings. The photos in question are definitely photoshopped.
2007-11-12 06:37:53 · answer #5 · answered by Guma Kawauso 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are many crazy theories out there. I personally believe that they are being put out in much the same way that our Government used inside agents to disrupt War protests in the 60s and 70s. As a way of discrediting those with real questions.
2007-11-12 06:37:29 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There were no missiles attached to the planes in the 911 attack.
2007-11-12 06:32:58 · answer #7 · answered by Summer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is this attached to "Bush Planned this" theory. Like the guy above said, the tower would have gone down double quick.
2007-11-12 07:19:49 · answer #8 · answered by Bob Dylan ♪ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why bother crash some thing as big , as heavy and as flammable as 747 in to a building at 500 miles an hour why would you need anything else
2007-11-12 06:31:55 · answer #9 · answered by bdsmslavegirly 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Another conspiracy theory by the left. I love it. Not long ago it was always right wing nuts that enjoyed conspiracy theories. Now the left is finding out how much fun it can be. Watch for the black helicopters.
2007-11-12 12:06:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋