I quite agree with kate - if you dont agree with Matthew he doesnt want to know. Its becoming tiresome. I thought it was discrimination today as usual unless you happen to be gay in which the sun shines out of you **** (no pun intended).
2007-11-12 00:55:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Puppet Dictator 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i did not see it, even though it does look fairly unempathic to not recognize that it may frighten toddlers who observed it. the mum and dad are patently guilt ridden, and so bypass charging forward of their attempt to locate her, and additionally tutor to the worldwide that they are attempting to locate her. There can't be lots of people who're not attentive to the placement, and it must be argued that the further and further public fuss is made approximately it, the less probably she is to be got here upon risk-free. i ask your self what the familiar public reaction could have been had not her mum and dad the two been medical doctors, the being concerned occupation, and as a replace been working type. As you point out a necessary element became that she became left on my own, to not say the entire subject became not merely poor undesirable success. yet i think of this guilt is blinding them to issues that would ideally be seen as for sure unwell seen to them, ie the advert.
2016-12-16 05:59:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've noticed on this show when they have phone ins that if the person doesn't share the same view as Matthew he starts to shout over them,then just cuts them off claiming he's right and there wrong?? i thought the idea was to express your views?
2007-11-11 23:38:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Princess xx 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I watch this show + they always have unanswerable questions to discuss. Would have been better if 1 of the panel was more overweight to even out the debate a bit.
2007-11-11 21:23:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by msj2uk 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm just watching the repeat on FiveLife we've only just got to the bit when the guy absailed past the window. Only on live TV.
2007-11-12 22:35:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by truth_and_time_tells_all 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, but I've never taken any notice of what that nasty little piece of work says or does, ever since it was HIM who "let the cat out of the bag" over the John Leslie business a few years ago. Had it not been for the little squirt's big mouth, John Leslie might still have a decent career ! ! !
2007-11-12 04:02:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by minefelloff 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yeah it's discrimination, how humiliating would it be for anyone to be weighed in public, whether they're overweight or not.
2007-11-11 20:59:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rogue 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cheeky git well i think he should get a licence for that face
2007-11-12 03:46:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by joanna d 009 3
·
0⤊
0⤋