Don't tell me you support her just because she's a woman. Because if that's your answer, then why not Condi Rice? Don't tell me she's more experienced than Obama? She has less than one full term more experience than Obama. Don't play the "she was in the White House for 8 years" card either. My mom is a head shrink, and been married to my step-father for 20 years but that doesn't qualify my step-father to be anyone's therapist. What makes her such a good candidate?
2007-11-11
19:44:45
·
20 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
While I agree with those that don't support her...I want to know why people do support her
2007-11-11
19:57:00 ·
update #1
Udandara then give me a valid reason to support her
2007-11-11
20:00:45 ·
update #2
Why does 8 years as First Lady make her more qualified than Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan?
2007-11-12
07:01:00 ·
update #3
By the way if we're basing qualification on experience as First Lady then Laura Bush is more qualified because she's the incumbent First Lady and is privy to executive knowledge that Hillary doesn't have.
2007-11-12
07:03:17 ·
update #4
? What is her plan to withdraw the troops?
2007-11-12
07:04:29 ·
update #5
FRAGINAL...I'll give you her intelligence and she's a lawyer...but haven't we already shot down her experience? Try to come up with something valid? McCain has more experience in Congress, Romney and Rudy have more executive experience
2007-11-12
07:30:48 ·
update #6
Well I guess this proves it...the liberals don't have any logical or valid reason to support Hillary. Just goes to show you that liberals cannot argue any point with truth or logic. Looks like I'll have to pick one of the Hillary haters.
2007-11-12
17:28:41 ·
update #7
FRAGINAL... even your blog has Hillary in third behind Ron Paul and Fred Thompson
2007-11-12
17:31:39 ·
update #8
Honestly, I think she's probably the worst candidate in the running. She's so plainly fake, and is only in this campaign because of her ambition to be president.
1) She was born and raised in Illinois, educated in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, worked for a law firm in Arkansas, and was first lady (*cough*) of Arkansas and the US. Naturally, when she wanted to become a Senator, she didn't go to any place she lived before, but instead headed to New York. That's called "carpetbagging," and I can't believe that New Yorker's were dumb enough to elect her, and then re-elect her. She's using them to get to the White House.
2) She bombed her socialized healthcare plans while she was first lady, so naturally she's trying almost exactly the same initiatives as a presidential candidate, even though she knows that the healthcare industry lobbyists are going to influence Congress not to pass the legislation. Her socilaized healthcare plan is a pipe dream.
3) She talks a big game about pulling troops out of Iraq, but anyone with even the slightest understanding of international relations knows that NO president is just going to withdrawal troops without first securing the country. She's making promises now she has no intention of keeping, which might explain why she has never produced a plan for getting the troops out of Iraq.
4) She talks about being for the American people, but her political platforms suggest that she has a political agenda that cares nothing about the will of the majority of people.
I understand that some people want to see a woman president, but that's not a reasonable excuse to support a candidate just because they fit a certain gender role. Hillary is no kind of good for America, and will only hurt the country both domestically and internationally, especially in the Middle East, where most nations will not bother to listen to a woman leader.
2007-11-11 19:59:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence as a lawyer and experience as a Senator and former First Lady to become a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Hillary will likely win.
2007-11-12 00:47:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't forget to ask not to use the "she's better than Bush" argument.
Bush is not running, so I don't care if she is better than Bush...............Everyone is better than Bush.
There are more choices than Clintons and Bushs!
edit: not that many people really do support her.
I was talking with a buddy of mine today. We were joking that neither of us actually knows a single person that supports either Giuliani or Clinton (except one). How can they be such front runners, and I do not know one single supporter, except One! Who happens to be a woman, and says, point blank, that she does so because she is a woman (thank god most of these people are too lazy to vote).
The TV tells you one thing...but reality says that Obama will get the nomination. I've seen the guy draw crowds of 6000 in the midday summer Arizona heat outside (Arizona, summer at noon is friggen hot) that waited over an hour to hear him speak.
The only poll that matters is the one where people vote, and that is when a lot of people are going to be surprised
2007-11-11 19:47:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
She's not a good candidate.
She has tons of cash of her own and tons of wealthy donors.
She's the Neocon's favorite - besides Guiliani of course.
Check this out:
Mark Penn is chief strategist for the Hillary Clinton campaign. This article explains how Penn uses bogus polling and other dirty tricks to manipulate pubic opinion and "sell" candidates and ideas. He is the man behind the PR campaign that created a false illusion, as far back as January, that Clinton was the "front runner" and had broad support with the public.
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=14538&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=
People won't vote for her. Frankly I can't see any of the Dems winning. Watch Ron Paul. He has a real shot at winning despite what the lying corp media spews.
2007-11-11 19:53:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by doug4jets 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
i don't support her or any of the candidates like her
Ron Paul all the way
time for a real change in America.
2007-11-11 20:58:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Because she's NOT a Republican!!!! This time around, that's all I need to hear; I'll be voting for whomever the Democratic Party nominates, barring a mass murderer. I've had it up to the gills with the GOP, and there's no WAY I'd vote for one of THEIR candidates in this contest.
My preferred nominee for President would be John Edwards; however, I don't think he'll get the nod.
2007-11-11 19:53:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋
because she realizes that you lost the war in Iraq. She wants to pull the troops before the US government collapses completely, financially and militarily.
But remember: the Illuminati like her. She will win.
2007-11-11 20:39:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Question Time 1
·
0⤊
4⤋
You have already made up your mind to score out any valid suggestion / reason. So why bother ?
2007-11-11 19:58:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I agree with you. I don't support her.
Some Democrats support her because of her last name.
2007-11-11 20:15:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by MFD 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't. I agree with the bumper sticker. Life's a *****, don't vote for one.
2007-11-11 19:47:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
4⤊
2⤋