Which one is false among the following statements?

Question

Wholes are composed by parts.
Parts are contained by wholes.
Equivalences are distinguished by differences.
Differences are equated by equivalences.
Limits are linked by links.
Links are limited by limits.
Sensations are influenced by influences.
Influences are sensed by sensations.
Origins are inherited by derivatives.
Derivatives are originated by origins.
Rules are conditioned by conditions.
Conditions are ruled by rules.
Intents are fulfilled by fulfillments.
Fulfillments are intended by intents.

Source: thought predictor http://wwf.totalh.com/tp

Answer 1

Intents are fulfilled by fulfillments. I've tossed that one over more than a few times, and I've come to the conclusion that you can't reach fulfillment without first having intents. So how can you fulfill an intent with another fulfillment? It doesn't add up.

Answer 2

Wholes are composed by parts. Wholes are parts in composition.

Parts are contained by wholes. 'contain' atoms have composition, but no boundary, skin or solid surface, their parts are an actual, an active relation, the parts are not spacially constant to each other.

Equivalences are distinguished by differences. Equations of a polynomial nature or kind are only intelligible if its parts are differentiable.

Differences are equated by equivalences.
Differences are equated only in the common fact they are not the same, they are not identical to each other, they have different identities.

Limits are linked by links. ''link'' is unknown descriptive, e.g. linked for what purpose.

Links are limited by limits. Links have measurable limits, they are finite, have ends in their dimensions, conservation in their measurment, not infinite or incompletable measurement.

Sensations are influenced by influences. Sensations are influences.

Influences are sensed by sensations. influences are sensations

Origins are inherited by derivatives. Derivatives have origins as place of resource.

Derivatives are originated by origins. Derivatives may or may not become existent in their place as origin.

Rules are conditioned by conditions.
Rules are conditions, conditions are determinant for other possibility.
Conditions are ruled by rules. Conditions as rules determinate.

Intents are fulfilled by fulfillments. Intents are fulfilled in conditions for no other possibility but fulfillment for that intent.

Fulfillments are intended by intents. Intended intents are possible, not certain.

Answer 3

The statements have countless issues which makes figuring out a remarkable and fake one no longer difficulty-free. the 1st is a grammatical blunders. In English, it is substantial perceive the object. a million and 2, do no longer perceive an merchandise. The statements make as plenty experience as: a number of those governing the id and prognosis of a few are undemanding to a pair. Few of those governing the id and prognosis of few are undemanding to few. a lot of those governing the id and prognosis of many are undemanding to many. Rewriting the two techniques so as that there are grammatically remarkable, will advance speaking the thought. A sentence in English is often believed to incorporate a concern and a predicate. that's the problem and that's the predicate in a million and 2?

Answer 4

I find most of them false because the truisms contained in statements like "Limits are linked by links" uses the same base word to define a relationship; a different word must be used to differentiate the inherant need to understand what a "link" is in your context.
Most of your propositions contain verb and object defined by the same word. You can't make sense of this in any reasonable context.

Answer 5

First step is the beginning of the journey.
Last step is the journey to another world.

Answer 6

the first one of each group is true