2007-11-11 16:10:02 · 17 answers · asked by BELLO BELLO BELLO BELLO AGAIN 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
80% of the people will pick wwe over tna any day but its very hard to pick one or the other for two reasons....tna is just a baby promotion they run on little funding and little exposure...wwe is a legend promotion ran on billions and has tons of exposure....wwe is like a fossil in the wrestling industry it has been around for soo long that people just like it for what theve seen in the past....tna is just growing up and people dont like it because of the 6 sided ring and the wrestlers arent well known....now tna is doing one major mistake that is going to cost them in the long run and that is pushing old stars over younger talent...wwe stars shouldnt get such a huge push in a company that was based on there own home grown talent at one point....tna has lost focus on that and i can honestly say that i dont care for old wwe stars or wcw stars anymore....i like the younger and more talented stars of the future....tna is heading in the same direction as wcw did...
2007-11-11 16:17:06 · answer #1 · answered by (Genibus Nitito Canus) 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well...........in terms of in the right now, WWE. However, TNA reminds me a lot of how ECW was 15 years ago as in it is a small regional promotion that is starting to rise. The main thing with TNA right now is they MUST keep the guys that will be the future of that compamy going, which is why you see A.J. Styles' heel run( to see how credible he could be as a top heel), the push being given to guys like Jay Lethal and The Motor City Machine Guns. These guys WILL be TNA's future, and if they can use the old WWE stars that are pissed of at Vince to help give these new young guns pushes and experience, it will pay off. We know that Christian and Samoa Joe give you quality matches, and now TNA is branching out to see who else can take the next step. If TNA can get their hands on RVD or C.M. Punk or another "mid level" WWE star that isn't getting a big push and bring them in, it could be VERY beneficial. The WCW/WWE stars in TNA right now are more being used to HELP TNA get bigger, so I don't mind seeing Sting or Nash or Angle. If they're dislike of Vince helps make a company that COULD push WWE as the top wrestling company, I'd be ALL for it. Right now I think TNA does a better job with what they have to work with, and if they keep growing, we could see TNA reach a point where they DO seriously compete with WWE.
2007-11-12 01:01:23 · answer #2 · answered by reno_sox_fan 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say World Wrestling Entertainment. I pick WWE for 2 simple reasons, they have been on the pro wrestling business way longer than TNA. Every major superstar that develops on OVW goes to WWE. If you can see, the TNA roster is partially made up by former WWE stars. TNA can't get their own stars. Anyways like I said, WWE anytime.
2007-11-12 00:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE as been round for very long time so they will be bigger promotion. But TNA is giving them run for the money , TNA don't have kind of money WWE got but they are doing good they need to have the veteran's help the newer guys in the ring. TNA got good some wrestlers they just need ring experience due time TNA will just be big as WWE if they do it right. We got Sting always been with TNA even back before WCW change its name. Even some the guys was and also still in the WWE that took it to the next level came from WCW like Stone Cold Steve Austin, Dudley Boys, Billy Gunn back then he team with his brother Bart Gunn Knowed as the Smoking Gunns, then you got Shawn Micheal then team with Marty Jeannette knowed as The Rockers they all took it to the next level. Both shows are good just WWE been round for long long time. Vince Jr, Vince Sr then there was McMahon the oldest one don't know his name they all own WWE,WWF, WWWF etc, there 3 generation I know of. The number one Question is after all we saw in the last 50 yrs what is next in wrestling does wrestling only got few more yrs left or what before it starts to die out like everything else.
2007-11-12 04:35:16 · answer #4 · answered by rebal_dog66 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like TNA here. I think that they go for guys who people like. I enjoy watching Kevin Nash; I think he does a good promo. Any promotion with Batista as its flagship guy is horrible (he cannot promo). I also like Tag Teams. TNA has 3D and LAX along with the Steiner Brothers: the WWE has London and Kendrick and Jesse and Festus (can someone stop with the redneck gimmick it's kinda cliche). TNA values promo ability over physical ability in some spots. I really like this because watching a million guys like Batista was only fun until I was 12 years old.
2007-11-12 00:30:10 · answer #5 · answered by Derrek M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
-Honestly, it's ok to have ex-WWE talent, if it's going to help elevate other talent. I mean Mr. Kennedy is ex-TNA talent, he's in WWE, Mickie James-TNA, MVP-TNA.
-I agree with Genital with enjoying seeing other talent.
-I am TNA, b/c its a different company, no Hunter Has Herpes on the show, so why watch RAW, when you don't have HHH on TNA?
-WWE marks don't believe in other promotions, b/c Vince is a god in their world. Vince is a cheat.
2007-11-12 00:28:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Tna is just leaching off wwe wrestlers.
2007-11-12 04:00:45 · answer #7 · answered by Jigs4w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE ~ TNA has washed has beens.
2007-11-12 00:44:29 · answer #8 · answered by kim_in_craig 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA is the best show right now
2007-11-12 00:45:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
tna and they just had the match of the year
2007-11-12 00:54:35 · answer #10 · answered by Hey Yo Chico 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋