That was a sneaky way to get a insult in about Bush, and I disagree with you regarding the potholes. Bush has done very good, the potholes are called the New Congress, and they are disgusting. Remember their PORK in the war funding bills, they tried to sneak through, which was billions of dollars that had nothing to do with the war at all. The amnesty bill proved that 90 % of Dems wanted it passed, and also the danger of being lead into socialism and communism , if certain lefties gets elected. I can tell you this, Hillary Clinton and Hussein Obama are not good for America.
2007-11-11 16:06:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by lilly4 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul because the rest have a plan for New World Government. They take contributions from wealthy business industries that don't have our best interest. They are purposely bankrupting the dollar and using this B.S. war to get oil and control.
Ron Paul won't win, because google "rigged elections" and see the NASA computer programmer who testified Bush didn't really win, he was asked to make software for Ohio and Florida.
But he stands for America's original values, people are the power not the wealthy businessmen who payoff the government.
Google "North American Union" "Amero" and "Fema Death camps"
2007-11-11 15:59:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lil Blousou 3
·
3⤊
3⤋
all of us ought to overcome Obama after the wear and tear is classified in u.s. realizes that they are only billions of dollars interior the hollow with no longer something to coach for it different than having the 1st mulatto president.
2016-10-16 05:06:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ralph Nader. He has always stood for the people. The problem is that he doesn't worship money. And he wants to help the poor. So he could never get elected. Americans only like people that will make them rich. By the way, how has that been working out for you lately??
2007-11-11 16:03:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The best? Pat Buchanan
The next? Mitt Romney
2007-11-11 15:57:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by MightyMoonpie 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul would be the best for America and its citizens
2007-11-11 21:25:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am sorry but if you are headed in the direction of the blanket statement that we should pull out of the war now then I am not sure I can have a serious discussion with you...
2007-11-11 15:48:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Girly-Girl 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think that any of the current candidates will be good. I can't stand Hillary's posturing. And is America ready for a woman president? A black president?
I'd love to see an independent win.
2007-11-11 15:56:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sarah 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
Dude! "Bushes potholes"? You must be another one of the "Rock the Vote" people.
2007-11-11 15:47:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
The answer is Ron Paul.
clinton and Obama both said they thought Iraq is a good geographic stragedic area and they would keep troops in there.
Ron Paul however said he would bring them immediently home.
2007-11-11 15:58:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Flash 3
·
3⤊
3⤋